<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Roberts vs. Michael Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:18:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bowtrol</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-71339</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowtrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-71339</guid>
		<description>Yes I think Robers was correct...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I think Robers was correct&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harikari.com &#187; Ronald Reagan was a Michael Jackson Fan, John G. Roberts was Not</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39571</link>
		<dc:creator>harikari.com &#187; Ronald Reagan was a Michael Jackson Fan, John G. Roberts was Not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39571</guid>
		<description>[...] Weigel at The Washington Independent got a laugh out of this part of Robert&#8217;s rejection: In today’s Post there were already reports that some youngsters were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weigel at The Washington Independent got a laugh out of this part of Robert&#8217;s rejection: In today’s Post there were already reports that some youngsters were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmonkeydc</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39257</link>
		<dc:creator>webmonkeydc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39257</guid>
		<description>Now, I don&#039;t wish to cheapen or mock the friendship Taylor and Jackson experienced. It&#039;s not my place to judge that whatsoever. But how many other people, fans, and gawkers who didn&#039;t share anything close to their relationship are claiming they feel the same way? Read more: &lt;a href=&quot;http://richardtgarner.blogspot.com/2009/06/my-life-feels-so-empty-really.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://richardtgarner.blogspot.com/2009/06/my-l...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I don&#39;t wish to cheapen or mock the friendship Taylor and Jackson experienced. It&#39;s not my place to judge that whatsoever. But how many other people, fans, and gawkers who didn&#39;t share anything close to their relationship are claiming they feel the same way? Read more: <a href="http://richardtgarner.blogspot.com/2009/06/my-life-feels-so-empty-really.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://richardtgarner.blogspot.com/2009/06/my-l.." rel="nofollow">http://richardtgarner.blogspot.com/2009/06/my-l..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39254</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39254</guid>
		<description>Prince + Reagan = Kickass photo op</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prince + Reagan = Kickass photo op</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So, No Moonwalking Competition With Scalia And Stevens &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39256</link>
		<dc:creator>So, No Moonwalking Competition With Scalia And Stevens &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39256</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave Weigel in the Washington Independent, noting John Robert&#8217;s opinion of Prince: The whole thing’s a scream, but I lost it at this part: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave Weigel in the Washington Independent, noting John Robert&#8217;s opinion of Prince: The whole thing’s a scream, but I lost it at this part: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midday Open Thread &#124; Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39245</link>
		<dc:creator>Midday Open Thread &#124; Hillary Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39245</guid>
		<description>[...] Roberts urged Ronald Reagan not to send a letter to Michael Jackson. &#160;Roberts probably wanted Reagan to congratulate that wholesome singer who was lighting up the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Roberts urged Ronald Reagan not to send a letter to Michael Jackson. &nbsp;Roberts probably wanted Reagan to congratulate that wholesome singer who was lighting up the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shecky</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39225</link>
		<dc:creator>shecky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39225</guid>
		<description>The only way this would have been better is if he had referred to the newcomer as &quot;the Prince&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way this would have been better is if he had referred to the newcomer as &#8220;the Prince&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts vs. Michael Jackson &#124; The Washington Independent &#124; Michael Jackson 1958-2009</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39237</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts vs. Michael Jackson &#124; The Washington Independent &#124; Michael Jackson 1958-2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39237</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post:  John Roberts vs. Michael Jackson &#124; The Washington Independent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post:  John Roberts vs. Michael Jackson | The Washington Independent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwattersjr</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39214</link>
		<dc:creator>rwattersjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39214</guid>
		<description>.. and Roberts was correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. and Roberts was correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flit</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/comment-page-1#comment-39097</link>
		<dc:creator>Flit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941#comment-39097</guid>
		<description>Your takeaway is that Roberts didn&#039;t know Prince? (and btw, I didn&#039;t know Prince until Purple Rain, though I was somewhat younger)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My takeaway is that someone in the WH counsel shop had some sense - those cringe-worthy Presidential-Jackson photo-ops (Reagan, Bush, Clinton) and obsequious attempts to ride populist coattails haven&#039;t aged well ... Go Roberts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your takeaway is that Roberts didn&#39;t know Prince? (and btw, I didn&#39;t know Prince until Purple Rain, though I was somewhat younger)</p>
<p>My takeaway is that someone in the WH counsel shop had some sense &#8211; those cringe-worthy Presidential-Jackson photo-ops (Reagan, Bush, Clinton) and obsequious attempts to ride populist coattails haven&#39;t aged well &#8230; Go Roberts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
