Comments on: Conservatives Write Off Sanford as a National Leader

By: RedGraham

RedGraham — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:59:50 +0000

Sanford should have said “I did not have sex with that woman.” That is what the impeached Clinton said before he was convicted of perjury and had his law license revoked. Thank you Senator Feingold for that.

By: Matt Taylor

Matt Taylor — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:14:33 +0000

<<>>

Bull, Clinton became the first person in history REQUIRED to participate in his own prosecution.

The Republicans got to ask the question, decide what the answer was and the terms of the answer and then complain when he didn't fit their preconceived bigotries.

Ken Starr has all but admitted that he was aware the Republicans would view ANYTHING in his report as an impeachable offense, regardless of the validity or evidence.

By: Matt Taylor

Matt Taylor — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:12:11 +0000

<>

Clinton didn't spend his whole political career as a bible thumping hypocrite demanding other people be thrown out of office for marital indiscretions.

<<>>

You mean when he demanded a divorce from his first wife while she was being treated for cancer? How about the multiple divorces for cheating on his spouse, all the while trumpeting his "family values"?

Or are you talking about his resignation, which was strictly because the Tubby tyrant was facing the very real possibility of losing his speakership because they lost seats in a year they should have picked them up?

By: Matt Taylor

Matt Taylor — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:09:35 +0000

<<>>

Well seeing as how that never happened thats truly amazing. Republicans didn't manage a majority vote on EITHER count you moron.

<<>>

Again seeing as how he has not been convicted off anything what the hell would they pardon him for?

By: RedGraham

RedGraham — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:27:00 +0000

Clinton refused to resign when he was caught similarly. Instead we were dragged thru that long dran out impeachment process. Gingrich took his lumps like a man.

By: Derek S

Derek S — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:55:24 +0000

What the hell does Clinton have to do with Sanford?

Typical, deflect and attack. Never actually just agree that the guy in your party is a scumbag.

BTW, Clinton has been out of office since 2000. Somebody probably should have told you.

By: Clear Vision

Clear Vision — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:48:12 +0000

Wow. When a republican stalwart shows he's human,has faults-like EVERYONE of you pointing fingers- he his shunned by his own party.THAT says more about the double standards and the rank hypocrisy of the republi-thugs . All of you pointing fingers and saying negative,vile things about Mark Sanford are NOT without sin.And more than a few of you adulterers ,so you're not so innocent.Its quite telling: “thsoe who doth speak the loudest,have the most to HIDE.”

By: RedGraham

RedGraham — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:07:14 +0000

Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones & Monica Lewinsky are all reasons Clinton should have resigned. He has the distinction of being the ONLY president to have been convicted by impeachment proceedings. The dutiful wife, Hellary, stoodby her man. The Obama regime will probably grant Clinton a pardon after the 2012 election when DADT will also get lifted by fiat. It doesn't look like the usurper will get a second term. Thank God for Linda Tripp & Alan Keyes!

By: Jack_Bauer

Jack_Bauer — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:08:28 +0000

As a matter of fact Clinton was impeached by the full House on the charges of lying under oath.

His hound-dogging was just the reason he lied under oath. The founding fathers did not have adultery in mind when they wrote the constitution. It was Clinton who committed the offense that was construed as a high crime or misdemeanor and subject to an impeachment hearing.

You might want to read up on that ancient history -- it was all of 11 years ago, so no wonder you've forgotten.

Oh -- and thanks to the Republicans in the Senate, Clinton avoided the fate of being the first President booted from office at an impeachment trial.

By: Jack_Bauer

Jack_Bauer — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:56:29 +0000

So basically Barack Obama is a secret neo-con in league with all the billionaires who paid for his election?

Thanks for clearing that up. Is "neo-con" still code for Jew on the left? I'm not up to date on the latest in fringe ravings.

Now don't you hava an Illuminati/Bilderberg Group/Hellfire Club/Masonic Lodge conspiracy to enlighten us all about.

I can't wait for your next news. Or for me to be super-rich. That would be soooo, soooper, doncha know.