<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cornyn: I&#8217;ll Support Norm Coleman if He Appeals to the Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/48351/cornyn-ill-support-norm-coleman-if-he-appeals-to-the-supreme-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48351/cornyn-ill-support-norm-coleman-if-he-appeals-to-the-supreme-court</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:08:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48351/cornyn-ill-support-norm-coleman-if-he-appeals-to-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-40002</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48351#comment-40002</guid>
		<description>As a Texan &#039;represented&#039; by Cornyn, I&#039;d like to say:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;screw off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Cornyn also argued that there was a larger issue at play than whether the Democrats got a 60th Senate seat.&lt;br&gt;&#039;That is the real question here. I realize it’s manifested itself in terms of who actually wins this seat, but I think that should be the focus.&#039;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No one believes you. We know you didn&#039;t want the 60 votes to happen. You REALLY didn&#039;t. MN had 7 months without representation in the Senate, all because your guy wouldn&#039;t concede as gracefully and in as timely a manner as Al Gore did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Texan &#39;represented&#39; by Cornyn, I&#39;d like to say:</p>
<p>screw off.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cornyn also argued that there was a larger issue at play than whether the Democrats got a 60th Senate seat.<br />&#39;That is the real question here. I realize it’s manifested itself in terms of who actually wins this seat, but I think that should be the focus.&#39;&#8221;</p>
<p>No one believes you. We know you didn&#39;t want the 60 votes to happen. You REALLY didn&#39;t. MN had 7 months without representation in the Senate, all because your guy wouldn&#39;t concede as gracefully and in as timely a manner as Al Gore did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickCoMatic</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48351/cornyn-ill-support-norm-coleman-if-he-appeals-to-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-38413</link>
		<dc:creator>RickCoMatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48351#comment-38413</guid>
		<description>Senator Cornyn should know, that upon the Minnesota Supreme Court reaching a decision in the matter of  Coleman v. Franken, that case is concluded.  The overwhelming opinions of legal scholars who have studied this case is that the Minn Sup. Court will find for Franken.  The decision will close the books on the Election Contest.  The Court will likely include an order for the signing and delivering of the Election Certificate.&lt;br&gt;Should the defeated former Senator wish to further the folly he embarked upon at the behest of the GOP Senatorial Committee, Coleman will have to bring a new case.  His business with The Honorable Senator Franken concluded; Coleman  will need to file suit against the Minnesota State Legislature.  The Supreme Court of The United States does not hear cases about the Election to Office of United State Senators.  That process, as Senator Cornyn should know, is reserved for the United States Senate by itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Cornyn should know, that upon the Minnesota Supreme Court reaching a decision in the matter of  Coleman v. Franken, that case is concluded.  The overwhelming opinions of legal scholars who have studied this case is that the Minn Sup. Court will find for Franken.  The decision will close the books on the Election Contest.  The Court will likely include an order for the signing and delivering of the Election Certificate.<br />Should the defeated former Senator wish to further the folly he embarked upon at the behest of the GOP Senatorial Committee, Coleman will have to bring a new case.  His business with The Honorable Senator Franken concluded; Coleman  will need to file suit against the Minnesota State Legislature.  The Supreme Court of The United States does not hear cases about the Election to Office of United State Senators.  That process, as Senator Cornyn should know, is reserved for the United States Senate by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
