Cornyn: I’ll Support Norm Coleman if He Appeals to the Supreme Court

By
Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm

At a luncheon at the National Republican Senatorial Committee’s headquarters near Capitol Hill (organized by the Heritage Foundation), I asked Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) if there was a Republican game plan ready when the Minnesota Supreme Court makes its ruling in the contested 2008 Minnesota Senate race — if, as many expect, it decides that Al Franken (D) defeated former Sen. Norm Coleman (R). Although he cautioned that “most predictions about judicial outcomes are 50/50″ and that he didn’t rule out a Coleman win in the state Supreme Court, Cornyn said that Republicans were ready to back more lawsuits if Coleman lost.

“We’ll do everything we can to support Norm as long as he has appellate remedies to pursue,” Cornyn said. “I’m not suggesting Norm has this plan in mind, because frankly I think he’s hopeful it turns out well at the state Supreme Court. But as a former state Supreme Court judge and as a recovering lawyer for 30 years now, I would tell that if he were to lose, what happens is that the secretary of state and the governor are required to sign a certificate of election. Just as a procedural matter, if — and this is a big if — Norm were to decide to appeal this matter to the United States Supreme Court under the Bush v. Gore (2000) precedent, which says that under the Equal Protection Clause uniform counting standards are a Constitutional matter, that they could appeal to the United States Supreme Court. The justice that’s responsible for that area — I think it’s Justice Alito — could issue a stay in the issuance of the election certificate, and it could be referred to the entire court.”

Cornyn wasn’t sure that this would happen. “I say all this as ‘could,’” he said, “not as ‘will or should.’ It depends on what the Minnesota Supreme Court does. But at the oral arguments, Franken’s lawyers did argue about the applicability of the Bush v. Gore standard. It makes no sense, and it doesn’t meet the Supreme Court’s constitutional precedent, to say that one local election official can decide by one standard which ballots should be counted and that some official somewhere else could decide by a different standard.”

Cornyn also argued that there was a larger issue at play than whether the Democrats got a 60th Senate seat. “I’m very proud of Norm Coleman for fighting the good fight to protect the right of Minnesota voters to make sure all legitimate votes are counted,” said Cornyn. “That is the real question here. I realize it’s manifested itself in terms of who actually wins this seat, but I think that should be the focus.”

You can follow TWI on Twitter and Facebook.

Follow David Weigel on Twitter


Comments

3 Comments

RickCoMatic
Comment posted June 23, 2009 @ 8:36 pm

Senator Cornyn should know, that upon the Minnesota Supreme Court reaching a decision in the matter of Coleman v. Franken, that case is concluded. The overwhelming opinions of legal scholars who have studied this case is that the Minn Sup. Court will find for Franken. The decision will close the books on the Election Contest. The Court will likely include an order for the signing and delivering of the Election Certificate.
Should the defeated former Senator wish to further the folly he embarked upon at the behest of the GOP Senatorial Committee, Coleman will have to bring a new case. His business with The Honorable Senator Franken concluded; Coleman will need to file suit against the Minnesota State Legislature. The Supreme Court of The United States does not hear cases about the Election to Office of United State Senators. That process, as Senator Cornyn should know, is reserved for the United States Senate by itself.


Don
Comment posted June 30, 2009 @ 9:11 pm

As a Texan 'represented' by Cornyn, I'd like to say:

screw off.

“Cornyn also argued that there was a larger issue at play than whether the Democrats got a 60th Senate seat.
'That is the real question here. I realize it’s manifested itself in terms of who actually wins this seat, but I think that should be the focus.'”

No one believes you. We know you didn't want the 60 votes to happen. You REALLY didn't. MN had 7 months without representation in the Senate, all because your guy wouldn't concede as gracefully and in as timely a manner as Al Gore did.


Jiongtu
Comment posted May 28, 2011 @ 6:29 am

Come to our online store to Replica Watches sale. We specialize in top quality Replica Cartier Watches that are famous around the world.       
Here you can find interesting information about Breitling Company and Replica Breitling Watches.
Fake Rolex Watches are available at our online store. You will find out the best Replica Bvlgari Watches which are of high quality and cheap prices.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.