Comments on: Surprise! Bankers Don’t Like the Idea of a Consumer Protection Agency for Financial Products http://washingtonindependent.com/47688/surprise-bankers-dont-like-the-idea-of-a-consumer-protection-agency-for-financial-products National News in Context Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:35:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Banks abhor consumer protection « Later On http://washingtonindependent.com/47688/surprise-bankers-dont-like-the-idea-of-a-consumer-protection-agency-for-financial-products/comment-page-1#comment-37803 Banks abhor consumer protection « Later On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:10:05 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=47688#comment-37803 [...] in Business, Congress, Democrats, Government at 2:09 pm by LeisureGuy Mary Kane in the Washington Independent: Well, this should come as no surprise: Financial industry groups already are gearing up to fend [...] [...] in Business, Congress, Democrats, Government at 2:09 pm by LeisureGuy Mary Kane in the Washington Independent: Well, this should come as no surprise: Financial industry groups already are gearing up to fend [...]

]]> By: steveherb http://washingtonindependent.com/47688/surprise-bankers-dont-like-the-idea-of-a-consumer-protection-agency-for-financial-products/comment-page-1#comment-34272 steveherb Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:53:43 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=47688#comment-34272 Why is it many home owners aren't able to file charges under current laws. Chapter 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Chapter 47 Fraud and False Statements. Section 1005, 1006, 1010, 1014.<br><br> <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/47/toc.html" rel="nofollow">http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/...</a><br><br>These U.S. Code Federal Laws explain the broker, lender, or anyone employed thru a financial institution who defraud or falsified a doc. faces up to 1 million or 30 years. NO where does it state the home owner signing the docs to be prosecuted. Why simply because the home owner doesn't have the employed power to enforce a document into borrowing. You had my bank statements. You had tax copies from my accountant. You had my credit report. Doesn't matter where I signed. You created the loan. You created the fraud. Not only sue your lender but prosecute your lender. RESCIND MY MORTGAGE OR GO TO JAIL. Why is it many home owners aren't able to file charges under current laws. Chapter 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Chapter 47 Fraud and False Statements. Section 1005, 1006, 1010, 1014.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/...

These U.S. Code Federal Laws explain the broker, lender, or anyone employed thru a financial institution who defraud or falsified a doc. faces up to 1 million or 30 years. NO where does it state the home owner signing the docs to be prosecuted. Why simply because the home owner doesn't have the employed power to enforce a document into borrowing. You had my bank statements. You had tax copies from my accountant. You had my credit report. Doesn't matter where I signed. You created the loan. You created the fraud. Not only sue your lender but prosecute your lender. RESCIND MY MORTGAGE OR GO TO JAIL.

]]> By: Surprise! Bankers Don’t Like the Idea of a Consumer Protection Agency for Financial Products http://washingtonindependent.com/47688/surprise-bankers-dont-like-the-idea-of-a-consumer-protection-agency-for-financial-products/comment-page-1#comment-34027 Surprise! Bankers Don’t Like the Idea of a Consumer Protection Agency for Financial Products Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:40:47 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=47688#comment-34027 [...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptWell, this should come as no surprise: Financial industry groups already are gearing up to fend off a proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency that would regulate mortgages, credit cards, and other kinds of consumer lending. The idea was a key part of the financial system overhaul that President Obama outlined on Wednesday. Although Obama called for all kinds of sweeping changes in the nation’s regulatory system, it’s the Consumer Finance Protection Agency that’s drawing the most fire, [...] [...] News Sources wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptWell, this should come as no surprise: Financial industry groups already are gearing up to fend off a proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency that would regulate mortgages, credit cards, and other kinds of consumer lending. The idea was a key part of the financial system overhaul that President Obama outlined on Wednesday. Although Obama called for all kinds of sweeping changes in the nation’s regulatory system, it’s the Consumer Finance Protection Agency that’s drawing the most fire, [...]

]]> By: steveherb http://washingtonindependent.com/47688/surprise-bankers-dont-like-the-idea-of-a-consumer-protection-agency-for-financial-products/comment-page-1#comment-34023 steveherb Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:53:43 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=47688#comment-34023 Why is it many home owners aren't able to file charges under current laws. Chapter 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Chapter 47 Fraud and False Statements. Section 1005, 1006, 1010, 1014.<br><br> <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/47/toc.html" rel="nofollow">http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/...</a><br><br>These U.S. Code Federal Laws explain the broker, lender, or anyone employed thru a financial institution who defraud or falsified a doc. faces up to 1 million or 30 years. NO where does it state the home owner signing the docs to be prosecuted. Why simply because the home owner doesn't have the employed power to enforce a document into borrowing. You had my bank statements. You had tax copies from my accountant. You had my credit report. Doesn't matter where I signed. You created the loan. You created the fraud. Not only sue your lender but prosecute your lender. RESCIND MY MORTGAGE OR GO TO JAIL. Why is it many home owners aren't able to file charges under current laws. Chapter 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Chapter 47 Fraud and False Statements. Section 1005, 1006, 1010, 1014.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/...

These U.S. Code Federal Laws explain the broker, lender, or anyone employed thru a financial institution who defraud or falsified a doc. faces up to 1 million or 30 years. NO where does it state the home owner signing the docs to be prosecuted. Why simply because the home owner doesn't have the employed power to enforce a document into borrowing. You had my bank statements. You had tax copies from my accountant. You had my credit report. Doesn't matter where I signed. You created the loan. You created the fraud. Not only sue your lender but prosecute your lender. RESCIND MY MORTGAGE OR GO TO JAIL.

]]>