Comments on: WorldNetDaily vs. Shep Smith

By: Jay @ work at home

Jay @ work at home — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:15:12 +0000

Shepard Smith gives me a laugh on his opinions, and suggestions.

By: RedGraham

RedGraham — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:00:30 +0000

Many.

By: RedGraham

RedGraham — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:59:23 +0000

Don't forget “the tin-foil hat crowd”! IMPEACH the USURPER!

By: stanbo

stanbo — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:38:04 +0000

well when ever the media doesnt have a reasonable explanation they bring out the racist word or crazy or extremist word whatever they feel like using that day to attack the person instead of refuting the charge.

By: ejkrigbaum

ejkrigbaum — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:47:28 +0000

I'm quite certain that no court has actually heard the case.
they have simply dismissed it. So your arguments that a court has seen the Birth Certificate doesn't hold water. The “fact” that some Hawaiian bureaucrat says she's seen the BC doesn't prove anything either. I've not seen anything that she said the BC was valid AND stated he was born in Hawaii AND what hospital AND what doctor. In a court of law, these statements are all here say, and not admissible as evidence. Finally, why is the BC not available? What is he hiding? Aren't you even curious? No, because you are blinded by your socialist religion.

By: ejkrigbaum

ejkrigbaum — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:17:28 +0000

This is not a matter of opinion. Either he's eligible or he's not. The “fact” is the Certification of Live Birth does not prove his eligibility. He MUST prove his eligibility. If I were him I would WANT to prove my eligibility and stop this stupid argument. By not going ahead and proving factual proof, he's appearing to be hiding something. By spending all this effort and obviously a lot of money so as not to prove it, he's OBVIOUSLY hiding something. Is Shepard Smith too stupid to not understand this? Are those defending him and also joining him in his RIGHT WING slanders too stupid, as well. Or are they just too blinded by their communist/socialist brainwashing to be able to reason and to be honest aout the whole thing? I think the latter.

By: LaLee

LaLee — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:12:29 +0000

Mister Holman, would you care to enlighten us regarding "real evidence and a huge quantity of circumstantial evidence, not to mention hidden evidence and obvious deceptions, that Barak Obama is a usurper to the office of POTUS" by showing us at least JUST ONE of those "evidences"?

OTOH Obama's BC has been verified whether you like to believe it or not.

Associated Press Nov 1, 2008:
"The Associated Press quoted Chiyome Fukino as saying that both she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama's original birth certificate.

Fukino also was quoted by several other news organizations. The Honolulu Advertiser quoted Fukino as saying the agency had been bombarded by requests, and that the registrar of statistics had even been called in at home in the middle of the night.

[...]

Fukino said she has “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

Would you "open your mind" to that?

By: LaLee

LaLee — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:12:29 +0000

By: Dexter Morgan

Dexter Morgan — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:50:20 +0000

Obama's clearly a Martian, which is surely a disqualification for POTUS. There's also an abundance of “circumstantial evidence” that Obama is in fact a gay America-hating marxist muslim nazi communist and isn't really “black” at all.

We're through the looking glass people….

By: Irish_Wake

Irish_Wake — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:04:38 +0000

The quantity of adherents to a given issue is not a gauge of its validity. In addition, circumstantial evidence will only confirm the opinions of those who already agree with the argument; I am unfamiliar with the meaning of hidden evidence. This is the difference between 'truthiness' and 'truth'.
The constitution states these qualifications for POTUS:
1) Natural born citizen.
2) Attained to the Age of thirty five Years.
3) Fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
The birth certificate has been answered by valid evidence acceptable to a court of law.
Are there additional charges that relate to the above three enumerated qualifications?