Comments on: ‘Right-Wing’ Rhetoric on Hold After Museum Shooting

By: proudconservative95020

proudconservative95020 — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:57:57 +0000

You got it all wrong. I am for killing NEITHER the doctor or the full term fetus. That is the point of the abortion (especially partial birth abortion) debate in the first place. Thus the rason it is called pro-LIFE. I was saying that if the killer did it to the doctor in the same gruesome manner as the doctor does to innocent babies who feel intesne pain and suffering, then the media would have a hay day with how “gruesome” of a death he died.

By: proudconservative95020

proudconservative95020 — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:57:57 +0000

By: Alferd

Alferd — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:35:50 +0000

24 is a dyed in the woll birther. Just like von Brunn

By: LaurieR

LaurieR — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:51:29 +0000

From Jonah Goldberg's column:

Never mind that von Brunn isn’t a member of the far right. Nor is he a member of the far left, as some on the right are claiming. He’s not a member of anything other than the crazy caucus. Von Brunn’s True North is conspiratorial anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. He’s not a member of the Christian Right. In fact, he denounces Christianity — just as Hitler did — as a Jewish plot against paganism and Western vigor. Nor is he a capitalist. Again, just as Hitler did, he hails socialism as the solution to the West’s problems.

By: davemartin7777

davemartin7777 — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:18:35 +0000

Way to ingnore reality pal.

Free Republic is rightwing site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic

Look at the "Freeper" thread on "Obama is Missing" again, signed by his name with his Freeper nick... "wannabegeek" on December 02, 2008

251 pages of rightwing crazy Freeper comments... on "Obama is Missing" not one call distention or call of extremism.

As a matter of fact, he was quite welcome on the Free Republic community.

Then look at dozens of his personal comment... you must be f'n blind not to see the connection to rightwing extremism.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:wannabegeek/...

By: anna perez

anna perez — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:29:02 +0000

This is probably an insult to the memory or Mr. Marx, but right wing conservatives, elected and otherwise, seem to think most Americans are as dumb as Groucho Marx's long time comic foil, Margaret Dumont, to whom Groucho once said so memorably, “who are going to believe, me or your lying eyes?” On issue after issue, in their alternate reality, we are all Margaret Dumont.

By: Palin Pushing for Victim Sainthood, Walsh Out Classes O’Reilly, The Right’s Lame Attempt to Paint Brunn as a Liberal « The Long Goodbye

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:08:03 +0000

[...] a neo-nazi white supremacist as a liberal would make for a good skit on the Stephen Colbert Show, ‘Right-Wing’ Rhetoric on Hold After Museum Shooting , Conservatives Reject Association With Jame… “Von Brunn would have been banned within his first three comments of posting at RedState, but [...]

By: rushthefatf***

rushthefatf*** — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:46:12 +0000

The people who are acting defensive and going on the attack seem to be seem to be doing so for a reason (Malkin, Goldberg, Rush, Levin & al). They contribute to an atmosphere of hatred and polarization. That's how they make money. They don't care about our country. They care about their ratings and their power and that's it. They don't even care about their listeners. They know that some of their most ardent followers are a little unhinged. They know this and they continue w/ the angry spew, whipping the nutjobs into a frenzy. They feel, so what if someone gets killed? They are sick people, just like the Operation Rescue people.
None of them are for building anything……they are just for tearing things down and demonizing people for no legitimate reason at all. And they incite violent acts by their words.
Karma.

By: 24AheadDotCom

24AheadDotCom — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:52:30 +0000

In Kindergarten Court – with Judge Weigel presiding – that's “irrefutable proof”. Elsewhere, it's fail. Where someone has an account doesn't indicate their ideology. For instance, I posted to BHO's site both under a made-up name and under one of my domain names. I also have a crypto account at DailyKos and non-crypto accounts at MyDD, TPMCafe, and other sites.

And, if he'd posted some of his more interesting thoughts there he would have been banned. Note also this thread, where he raises issues with people dissing Filipinos:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/191094...

By: Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Chicken-Wing, Paul McCartney and Wings « Around The Sphere

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:51:07 +0000

[...] David Weigel in Washington Independent: Other conservatives spent Wednesday explaining that von Brunn was not actually right-wing, and that his anti-Semitism and his conspiracy theories about the attacks of 9/11 pegged him as a left-winger. Leon Wolf of the conservative RedState.com wrote that the media’s treatment of the story — “because von Brunn is a racist, he must be a right-winger” was wildly off-base. “Von Brunn would have been banned within his first three comments of posting at RedState, but would likely have enjoyed a long career as a recommended diarist at DailyKos.” Michelle Malkin, a conservative columnist who spent several days asking why President Obama did not immediately respond to the murder of Pvt. William Long, pointed to von Brunn’s hatred of neoconservatives and cited an FBI visit to the offices of the Weekly Standard as proof that he was an “equal opportunity hater.” [...]