A Few Conflicts of Interest?
Thursday, June 11, 2009 at 11:48 am
Earlier this week, Legistorm discovered that the House Clerk’s Office had posted lawmakers’ latest financial disclosure forms — scheduled for release Friday — a few days early. The Washington Post dug through the records yesterday to find that some of the top cheerleaders for the $700 billion Wall Street bailout, which the House passed in October, were also heavily invested in the same struggling firms the massive rescue bill was designed to save.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), for example, was (along with her husband) heavily invested in American International Group, which has received about $170 billion in federal help under the bailout, The Post found.
Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and his wife held stock, retirement plans and other investments worth at least $183,000 and as much as $495,000 in firms benefiting from federal government rescue efforts, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.
Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) voted against the initial bill, but has since become one of the loudest supporters of using the bailout money to save Detroit’s ailing automakers. Not that it’s helped his investments in Chrysler, which has received billions of dollars under the bailout.
His disclosure forms for the end of 2007 showed he had between $1,000 and $15,000 in company stock, which by the end of last year fell to between $1 and $1,000 in value.
The disclosures prompted Melanie Sloan, who heads Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, a government watchdog group, to ask what just might be the appropriate question: “You wonder,” she told The Post, “if they’re voting on things because it’s good for the country or because it would increase their personal wealth.”
3 Comments
Pingback posted June 11, 2009 @ 6:47 pm
[...] spots in the Presidential line of succession last week with sudden resignations from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other department heads), the new partnership has pledged to put a permanent end to $500 dollar per barrel crude oil [...]
Comment posted June 11, 2009 @ 7:03 pm
That this article implies that Thaddeus McCotter's support of the auto bailout is tied to his investments is ridiculous. A rather small investment in a company should not and happily has not prevented McCotter from representing the people of Michigan's 11th district who rely heavily on the auto industry (Chrysler, GM, Ford, suppliers, and dealerships) for their livelihood.
If he didn't support a program to save Detroit's auto industry for the people he represents in Congress, he wouldn't be a very good representative.
Comment posted June 12, 2009 @ 2:03 am
That this article implies that Thaddeus McCotter's support of the auto bailout is tied to his investments is ridiculous. A rather small investment in a company should not and happily has not prevented McCotter from representing the people of Michigan's 11th district who rely heavily on the auto industry (Chrysler, GM, Ford, suppliers, and dealerships) for their livelihood.
If he didn't support a program to save Detroit's auto industry for the people he represents in Congress, he wouldn't be a very good representative.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss