Republicans to Propose Financial Regulatory Reform – With Absolutely No Teeth

By
Tuesday, June 09, 2009 at 9:42 am

What’s up with the Obama administration’s much-vaunted plans for financial regulatory reform? First, The Washington Post reports that an ambitious proposal for a systemic risk regulator — a single agency to regulate and monitor banking and  intervene if threats to the financial system emerge — is getting bogged down by all kinds of opposition. Smaller banks like their cozy relationship with their regulators just fine, thank you. Failed regulatory agencies that would be forced to go away are fighting to survive. (Office of Thrift Supervision, anyone?) And – no surprise here – the financial industry also is fighting off  the idea of a Financial Products Safety Commission that would ensure people understood things like exploding interest rates on mortgages.

But the most unusual twist is a new financial reform proposal in the works from the GOP. According to Reuters, which cites draft documents of the idea, congressional Republicans are close to coming up with a proposal to rein in the Federal Reserve and expand the bankruptcy code.

Here’s the best part: The Republicans apparently want to create an advisory board of regulators – which would have absolutely no enforcement or oversight powers. Now that’s putting teeth into reform! Clearly, the Republicans are alone in finding that the financial crisis must have been caused by regulators with too much authority on their hands.

The Republican draft package opposes giving systemic risk authority to the Federal Reserve, an idea that sources have said the administration favors, but many lawmakers distrust.

Instead, the Republicans call for creating a board of regulators and outside experts, chaired by the Treasury secretary, to study systemic risk and report quarterly. The board would have no enforcement or supervisory powers.

Another high priority of the Obama administration is empowering an agency, probably the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC), to seize and unwind troubled non-bank financial institutions. The idea is to avoid on-the-fly bailouts in the future like that of American International Group.

But Republicans, in a sharp repudiation of the bailout policies begun under former President George W. Bush, say in the draft document that they oppose such “resolution authority” and, instead, favor adding a new chapter to bankruptcy law.

I’m sure you feel much better about the stability of the financial system now. This reminds me of when the Republicans unveiled their alternative budget — with no details.

Maybe this new proposal for financial reform will come with charts as well.

Comments

5 Comments

WM
Comment posted June 9, 2009 @ 8:00 am

Ms. Kane, if you weren't such a nagging do-gooder who thinks with her emotions instead of reason and logic, you would realize that the financial crisis (as well as the housing crisis) was caused by government interference into the private sector, and no government regulator or official saw it coming. No “systemic regulator” for “systemic risk” (there is no such thing, unless you are talking about government, the only force able to intervene throughout the system) is able to prevent crises. You have offered no evidence that such an entity would be able to prevent crises, because there is no such evidence, and you are not concerned with the facts anyway. This is really all about your hate. You hate banks, capitalists, and anyone and anything that is a great wealth creator, and you desire to smash them. You don't care what's good for the country. This is really all about your desire to indulge in destruction of the people you envy.


The Washington Independent » Republicans to Propose Financial … |
Pingback posted June 9, 2009 @ 11:51 am

[...] See the rest here: The Washington Independent » Republicans to Propose Financial … [...]


Republican reform: Toothless rules « Later On
Pingback posted June 9, 2009 @ 1:42 pm

[...] in Business, Congress, GOP, Government at 10:42 am by LeisureGuy Mary Kane in the Washington Independent: What’s up with the Obama administration’s much-vaunted plans for financial regulatory reform? [...]


Teapotdome
Comment posted June 9, 2009 @ 3:12 pm

Hey, WM, what do you hate? The government? Public schools? Newspapers? Unions? Workers? The poor? Immigrants? Does that make you jealous of them?


Teapotdome
Comment posted June 9, 2009 @ 10:12 pm

Hey, WM, what do you hate? The government? Public schools? Newspapers? Unions? Workers? The poor? Immigrants? Does that make you jealous of them?


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.