<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surprise! Conservatives Support Conservative Activism by Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/45826/surprise-conservatives-support-conservative-activism-by-supreme-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45826/surprise-conservatives-support-conservative-activism-by-supreme-court</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomSwift</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45826/surprise-conservatives-support-conservative-activism-by-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-34994</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSwift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45826#comment-34994</guid>
		<description>&quot;...designed to decide what’s constitutional, not what’s popular. That’s how we got rid of things like enforced racial segregation in schools, remember&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If laws banning segregation are illegal, then mustn&#039;t laws designed to mix the races also be illegal? You can&#039;t have it both ways. Either the constitution allows discrimination on race or it doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;designed to decide what’s constitutional, not what’s popular. That’s how we got rid of things like enforced racial segregation in schools, remember&#8221;</p>
<p>If laws banning segregation are illegal, then mustn&#39;t laws designed to mix the races also be illegal? You can&#39;t have it both ways. Either the constitution allows discrimination on race or it doesn&#39;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomSwift</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45826/surprise-conservatives-support-conservative-activism-by-supreme-court/comment-page-1#comment-32664</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSwift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45826#comment-32664</guid>
		<description>&quot;...designed to decide what’s constitutional, not what’s popular. That’s how we got rid of things like enforced racial segregation in schools, remember&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If laws banning segregation are illegal, then mustn&#039;t laws designed to mix the races also be illegal? You can&#039;t have it both ways. Either the constitution allows discrimination on race or it doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;designed to decide what’s constitutional, not what’s popular. That’s how we got rid of things like enforced racial segregation in schools, remember&#8221;</p>
<p>If laws banning segregation are illegal, then mustn&#39;t laws designed to mix the races also be illegal? You can&#39;t have it both ways. Either the constitution allows discrimination on race or it doesn&#39;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

