<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Issa vs. Parents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/45818/issa-vs-parents/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45818/issa-vs-parents</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:33:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wiz Kid</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45818/issa-vs-parents/comment-page-1#comment-35234</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiz Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45818#comment-35234</guid>
		<description>Now, I am NOT a rocket scientist, but it occurs to me that providing leave to employees does reduce the number of man days available for the same monetary output of tax dollars. In short, the government must budget for an increase in man days equivalent to the number of leave days provided in order to accomplish the same quantity of work. This would involve hiring temporary workers, paying overtime to other workers, or extending the time-frame required to complete projects. All of these represent a real increase in net costs. So Mr. Columnist, maybe when you go about calling someone&#039;s claim disingenous, in the future, you might ask someone that knows their way around an economic text book for some advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I am NOT a rocket scientist, but it occurs to me that providing leave to employees does reduce the number of man days available for the same monetary output of tax dollars. In short, the government must budget for an increase in man days equivalent to the number of leave days provided in order to accomplish the same quantity of work. This would involve hiring temporary workers, paying overtime to other workers, or extending the time-frame required to complete projects. All of these represent a real increase in net costs. So Mr. Columnist, maybe when you go about calling someone&#39;s claim disingenous, in the future, you might ask someone that knows their way around an economic text book for some advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiz Kid</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45818/issa-vs-parents/comment-page-1#comment-33945</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiz Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45818#comment-33945</guid>
		<description>Now, I am NOT a rocket scientist, but it occurs to me that providing leave to employees does reduce the number of man days available for the same monetary output of tax dollars. In short, the government must budget for an increase in man days equivalent to the number of leave days provided in order to accomplish the same quantity of work. This would involve hiring temporary workers, paying overtime to other workers, or extending the time-frame required to complete projects. All of these represent a real increase in net costs. So Mr. Columnist, maybe when you go about calling someone&#039;s claim disingenous, in the future, you might ask someone that knows their way around an economic text book for some advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I am NOT a rocket scientist, but it occurs to me that providing leave to employees does reduce the number of man days available for the same monetary output of tax dollars. In short, the government must budget for an increase in man days equivalent to the number of leave days provided in order to accomplish the same quantity of work. This would involve hiring temporary workers, paying overtime to other workers, or extending the time-frame required to complete projects. All of these represent a real increase in net costs. So Mr. Columnist, maybe when you go about calling someone&#39;s claim disingenous, in the future, you might ask someone that knows their way around an economic text book for some advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
