Riedel: Stop Saying ‘Af-Pak’

By
Thursday, June 04, 2009 at 2:25 pm

The Cairo speech has eaten up most of my day, but last night, Bruce Riedel, the chairman of the Obama administration’s strategy review on Afghanistan and Pakistan, appeared on a panel at the International Spy Museum to talk about the Pakistani Inter Services Intelligence organization and its relationship to Afghan and Pakistani extremism. (More on that in a subsequent post.) During the Q&A, Riedel went off on the “Af-Pak” neologism that some in the administration use (or used to use) to indicate the interconnectedness of the two nations:

I don’t think anyone on this panel used the terminology “Af-Pak” and I’m glad they didn’t. I think it’s insulting. I don’t mean this personally. But I don’t think when we talk about two countries who are our putative allies and partners we should refer to them in a diminutive way. So let’s leave “Af-Pak” to USA Today and other newspapers that don’t have enough space to spell the names of our partners.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

4 Comments

None
Comment posted June 4, 2009 @ 1:26 pm

Or The Washington Independent, whose military and defense “correspondent” uses Af-Pak as a tag for his posts about Afghanistan or Pakistan. Sheesh.


None
Comment posted June 4, 2009 @ 8:26 pm

Or The Washington Independent, whose military and defense “correspondent” uses Af-Pak as a tag for his posts about Afghanistan or Pakistan. Sheesh.


Pakistan Panel at the International Spy Museum « Yale Afghanistan Forum
Pingback posted June 4, 2009 @ 11:14 pm

[...] Since Riedel is (after Richard Holbrooke) the man whose name appears most often in conjunction with “Af-Pak”, I had hoped he’d address the debate about that term. He did so, unambiguously: [...]


blogmafia
Comment posted September 2, 2011 @ 5:41 pm

Thank you. Fine issues.I have added to your favorites


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.