<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Note to Michigan Dems: Cash-for-Clunkers Still Contradicts New Federal Mileage Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Page</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/comment-page-1#comment-247896</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45571#comment-247896</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcampese</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/comment-page-1#comment-34939</link>
		<dc:creator>kcampese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45571#comment-34939</guid>
		<description>This bill will put every charity car donation program out of business since the amount of the voucher would be much more than the tax deduction. The solution is to allow a charity to issue the voucher for an eligible car in lieu of a tax dedcution. The charity would then junk the car in accordance wuth the law. Everyone would win, the car dealer, car maker, car buyer and charity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill will put every charity car donation program out of business since the amount of the voucher would be much more than the tax deduction. The solution is to allow a charity to issue the voucher for an eligible car in lieu of a tax dedcution. The charity would then junk the car in accordance wuth the law. Everyone would win, the car dealer, car maker, car buyer and charity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcampese</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/comment-page-1#comment-32566</link>
		<dc:creator>kcampese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45571#comment-32566</guid>
		<description>This bill will put every charity car donation program out of business since the amount of the voucher would be much more than the tax deduction. The solution is to allow a charity to issue the voucher for an eligible car in lieu of a tax dedcution. The charity would then junk the car in accordance wuth the law. Everyone would win, the car dealer, car maker, car buyer and charity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill will put every charity car donation program out of business since the amount of the voucher would be much more than the tax deduction. The solution is to allow a charity to issue the voucher for an eligible car in lieu of a tax dedcution. The charity would then junk the car in accordance wuth the law. Everyone would win, the car dealer, car maker, car buyer and charity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BADBOB</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/comment-page-1#comment-32159</link>
		<dc:creator>BADBOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45571#comment-32159</guid>
		<description>HEY MIKEY !!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;U DONT HAVE A CLUE !!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;READ WHAT U WROTE  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AND BUY THE WAY , THIS ISENT EVEN &quot;CLOSE&quot; TO 2016 , DA !!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEY MIKEY !!!!</p>
<p>U DONT HAVE A CLUE !!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>READ WHAT U WROTE  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>AND BUY THE WAY , THIS ISENT EVEN &#8220;CLOSE&#8221; TO 2016 , DA !!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ixlr8</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/comment-page-1#comment-32145</link>
		<dc:creator>ixlr8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45571#comment-32145</guid>
		<description>cash for clunkers is the Senate proposal.  Is the house amendment only including clunkers??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cash for clunkers is the Senate proposal.  Is the house amendment only including clunkers??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/comment-page-1#comment-32144</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45571#comment-32144</guid>
		<description>does this only apply to junk trades, is there a model year cut off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this only apply to junk trades, is there a model year cut off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/45571/note-to-michigan-dems-cash-for-clunkers-still-contradicts-new-federal-mileage-standards/comment-page-1#comment-32142</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=45571#comment-32142</guid>
		<description>Mike, responding to your first question... CAFE standard has been 27.5mpg since 1990. Even if you trade in a clunker with 12mpg and buy a car with 22mpg, you&#039;ve nearly halved your carbon output and oil consumption. This is where the biggest improvement can be made quickly. The Feinstein bill in the senate is more aggressive than Stabenow&#039;s bill for environmental improvements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, responding to your first question&#8230; CAFE standard has been 27.5mpg since 1990. Even if you trade in a clunker with 12mpg and buy a car with 22mpg, you&#39;ve nearly halved your carbon output and oil consumption. This is where the biggest improvement can be made quickly. The Feinstein bill in the senate is more aggressive than Stabenow&#39;s bill for environmental improvements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

