Sotomayor: A Necessary Antidote to Roberts

By
Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:17 pm

Buried in Jeffrey Toobin’s recent profile of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is this astonishing fact:

In every major case since he became the nation’s seventeenth Chief Justice, Roberts has sided with the prosecution over the defendant, the state over the condemned, the executive branch over the legislative, and the corporate defendant over the individual plaintiff.

The recent uproar over Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s comment eight years ago that being a Latina influences her perspective as a judge has led to charges by de facto Republican spokesmen from Rush Limbaugh to Glenn Beck that she’s a “racist” for acknowledging that fact.  But is it even possible that Roberts — a white man from Indiana, the privileged son of a steel company executive who went on to work, when not in the Reagan White House, as a corporate defense lawyer earning more than a million dollars per year –  is not influenced by his own ethnic, gender and economic background? Is it even possible that his decades writing appellate court briefs and opinions, insulated from the actual individuals involved in the cases he’s argued and decided, moving in “a circle of professional peers [that] consisted entirely of other wealthy and accomplished lawyers,” as Toobin writes, could not have affected the way he decides cases?  Would someone with the gender, race and economic background of Sotomayor — regardless of her previous statements — have similarly decided every single case that came before her in favor of the more powerful party?

Fortunately, probably not. It’s absurd to suggest that a judge comes to the bench without a lifetime of experiences — including race and gender, but many others as well — that color how she views some of the more nebulous and challenging cases that come before her.

As I wrote last week, and Adam Liptak also observed in an insightful New York Times piece on the impact of gender and race on the Supreme Court, academic studies of judicial decision-making have consistently found that female judges — many of whom likely faced gender discrimination themselves in a male-dominated legal profession — are more apt to vote in favor of plaintiffs in discrimination cases than are their male colleagues. On appeals courts, they appear to influence the male judges as well.

None of this should come as a huge surprise. As then-Sen. Barack Obama put it when Justice Roberts was nominated:

“In those five percent of hard cases, the constitutional text will not be directly on point. The languge of the statute will not be perfectly clear. Legal process alone will not lead you to a rule of decision.”

“In those circumstances, your decision about whether affirmative action is an appropriate response to the history of discrimination in this country or whether a general right of privacy encompasses a more specific right of women to control their reproductive decisions . . . the critical ingredient is supplied by what is in the judge’s heart.”

Noting that Roberts has “far more often used his formidable skills on behalf of the strong in opposition to the weak” — an observation that turns out to have been true of his votes on the Supreme Court as well — Obama voted against his confirmation.

With only one woman currently on the court and one racial minority — who’s turned out to be the court’s most conservative member — we’re hardly in danger of having a Supreme Court that bends over backwards to accomodate the weak, the poor or minorities at the expense of the powerful. Yet the rightward-tilt of a highly unrepresentative court makes the confirmation of Sotomayor that much more important.

Whether she had admitted it or not, her background will influence her views in that five percent of cases where empathy for the plaintiff is even relevant. That doesn’t mean she’ll always rule in their favor in those cases, and as I’ve noted before, even in some extremely sympathetic cases she has not. But judges are human beings, whose rulings involve and affect other people. What a sad day it would be if this country were to revert to the ideas of a century ago — when blacks, women and the poor were excluded from voting or sitting on juries, and only wealthy white men could be trusted to exercise the wisdom, logic and impartiality required to sit on the nation’s highest court.

Comments

5 Comments

John Truth
Comment posted May 31, 2009 @ 3:53 pm

Obama wants to replace one woman, David Souter, with another, Sonia Sotomayor.

As a divorced (man-hater), barren woman (child-hater, mom-hater), Sonia Sotomayor lacks experience (being a mom) to make any ruling about the sanctity of life.

In short, Ms. Sotomayor is an immature female, never achieving fuller awareness about life.

No human who never had to be responsible for a child can know what life truly means. Thus such a human has no business judging others whatsoever.

What sad times for all Americans that the only qualifying factors for becoming a USSC justice include lacking a penis and speaking Spanish, the language of those who conquered her ancestors.


Chris
Comment posted May 31, 2009 @ 10:27 pm

And…you're an idiot.

Graduated from Princeton, receiving the Pyne Award (given to the top student at the school); Graduated from Yale Law while being an editor at the law journal (this position is given to students who excel really well).

Has more judicial experience than ANY other Supreme Court Nominee in over 100 years.

Yeah, I could definitely see where that unqualified comes from.


ReaganiteRepublican
Comment posted June 3, 2009 @ 4:41 am

Unless one is delusional, Sotomayer is a racist, pure & simple, as are all members of the treasonous La Raza by definition- since their motto is “For our race everything- for others, nothing”.

Her record is nothing to shout about either, and frankly -if you’ve heard her speak- she’s not what you’d call a towering intellectual.

Eric Holder has some racial hangups and agenda too, calling us “cowards” regarding racial issues and letting-off Black Panthers who stood in front of a polling place with nightsticks.

And Obama himself has shown us a puzzling pro-Kenyan grudge against the British and has said some pretty odd things, even regarding his own grandmother… plus he's the one who nominated all these kooks in the first place.

Whatever happened to the idea of a colorblind society? Team Obama define their world in racial terms all the time- and unlike any white people I know. I wouldn't want to be judged by any of them after what I’ve heard come out of their own mouths- they sound like Jesse Jackson.

If Obama is going to go on with his “justice” agenda largely based upon race- the double standards need to stop… and NOW

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/


ReaganiteRepublican
Comment posted June 3, 2009 @ 11:41 am

Unless one is delusional, Sotomayer is a racist, pure & simple, as are all members of the treasonous La Raza by definition- since their motto is “For our race everything- for others, nothing”.

Her record is nothing to shout about either, and frankly -if you’ve heard her speak- she’s not what you’d call a towering intellectual.

Eric Holder has some racial hangups and agenda too, calling us “cowards” regarding racial issues and letting-off Black Panthers who stood in front of a polling place with nightsticks.

And Obama himself has shown us a puzzling pro-Kenyan grudge against the British and has said some pretty odd things, even regarding his own grandmother… plus he's the one who nominated all these kooks in the first place.

Whatever happened to the idea of a colorblind society? Team Obama define their world in racial terms all the time- and unlike any white people I know. I wouldn't want to be judged by any of them after what I’ve heard come out of their own mouths- they sound like Jesse Jackson.

If Obama is going to go on with his “justice” agenda largely based upon race- the double standards need to stop… and NOW

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/


PUMA SHOES
Comment posted July 8, 2010 @ 9:50 am

Recently,as the world's leading brand of dynamic life – Puma Shoes brand spokesperson,the world first flying especially thay Shared by iaaf boulder,the highest annual tournament,with a diamond premiership move recreational dress “blink” Shanghai nanjing Mens PUMA Shoes and Womens PUMA Shoes flagship,with large enthusiastic fans sharing “China” outside the runway Jamaica lightning with sex.

“I really rare Jamaica show elegance,surprise lightning speed” fan challenge.”Puma Speed Cat The boulder came in Shanghai,and also the diamond league 100 meters,200 meters dash to the world record holder after 2008 Olympic Games after winning his first return,not only for personal meaning for the Chinese fans very much,to feel the charm and world-class sports idol,but also very lucky.

Puma Ferrari Shoes The event,he's speaking with sexual experience,to the fans show less known side:”dynamic flyers” vigor nature.Not only is the world record holder,boulder dash also very love music,like the personality and passion life.

Discount Mbt shoes? The feeling ideas of wearing mbt shoes, I need to watch the wear on the bottom of the shoe and get the sole replaced before it split? this means for me,mbt unono sale, I would need a new sole every 6 months to be safe and at ?38,MBT Maliza Shoes, this will be expensive.

I enjoy wearing the shoes, but at this price, I may go back to my 10 year old pair of Nike runners, which still have lots of life left in them and Mbt shoes cost less than 1/2 the price of MBT shoes…….. Are MBT shoes worth the money? I am now not so sure. Could you give me a reply?

However The Mbt shoes on sale people say their shoes will last many years and many millions of steps. This is not the case for me. The sole on my MBT’s split and opened up and once this happens, they cannot be repaired.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.