<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush v. Gore Was a Per Curiam Opinion, Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adidas online</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/comment-page-1#comment-158259</link>
		<dc:creator>adidas online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44558#comment-158259</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kruboy44</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/comment-page-1#comment-36095</link>
		<dc:creator>kruboy44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44558#comment-36095</guid>
		<description>Did anyone tell Pat Buchana, he seems to not have a clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone tell Pat Buchana, he seems to not have a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Purser</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/comment-page-1#comment-36096</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Purser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44558#comment-36096</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t the media making this clearification to the public. The conservation pundits seems to be getting away  with a falsehood aid and abetted by the media. I wrote an article regarding this issue on &lt;a href=&quot;http://hubpages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hubpages.com&lt;/a&gt; under the pen prince1244. I find it amazing how our media is more like our public schools, terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#39;t the media making this clearification to the public. The conservation pundits seems to be getting away  with a falsehood aid and abetted by the media. I wrote an article regarding this issue on <a href="http://hubpages.com" rel="nofollow">hubpages.com</a> under the pen prince1244. I find it amazing how our media is more like our public schools, terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kruboy44</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/comment-page-1#comment-32588</link>
		<dc:creator>kruboy44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44558#comment-32588</guid>
		<description>Did anyone tell Pat Buchana, he seems to not have a clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone tell Pat Buchana, he seems to not have a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Purser</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/comment-page-1#comment-32587</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Purser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44558#comment-32587</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t the media making this clearification to the public. The conservation pundits seems to be getting away  with a falsehood aid and abetted by the media. I wrote an article regarding this issue on &lt;a href=&quot;http://hubpages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hubpages.com&lt;/a&gt; under the pen prince1244. I find it amazing how our media is more like our public schools, terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#39;t the media making this clearification to the public. The conservation pundits seems to be getting away  with a falsehood aid and abetted by the media. I wrote an article regarding this issue on <a href="http://hubpages.com" rel="nofollow">hubpages.com</a> under the pen prince1244. I find it amazing how our media is more like our public schools, terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/comment-page-1#comment-31672</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44558#comment-31672</guid>
		<description>In the real world, &quot;per curiam&quot; is Latin for squirrelly.  Appellate courts issue opinions per curiam when the judges are too embarrassed to sign their names to the opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Case in point: Smith v. Mullarkey, 121 P.3d 890 (Colo. 2005) (per curiam).  The justices were defendants in tort, and there were other judges available and authorized by law to hear the case.  For a judge to decide her own case is a Brobdignagian violation of the Fifth and/or Fourteenth Amendment, but who likes being sued?  Mary Mullarkey used the Bill of Rights as a tampon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the real world, &#8220;per curiam&#8221; is Latin for squirrelly.  Appellate courts issue opinions per curiam when the judges are too embarrassed to sign their names to the opinion.</p>
<p>Case in point: Smith v. Mullarkey, 121 P.3d 890 (Colo. 2005) (per curiam).  The justices were defendants in tort, and there were other judges available and authorized by law to hear the case.  For a judge to decide her own case is a Brobdignagian violation of the Fifth and/or Fourteenth Amendment, but who likes being sued?  Mary Mullarkey used the Bill of Rights as a tampon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lesser ajax</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44558/bush-v-gore-was-a-per-curiam-opinion-too/comment-page-1#comment-31618</link>
		<dc:creator>lesser ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44558#comment-31618</guid>
		<description>New York Times v. United States also had a per curiam opinion... precisely because the outcome was controversial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times v. United States also had a per curiam opinion&#8230; precisely because the outcome was controversial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

