http://washingtonindependent.com/44402/the-california-courts-reluctant-reasoning-in-upholding-prop-8 National News in Context Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://washingtonindependent.com/44402/the-california-courts-reluctant-reasoning-in-upholding-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-31731 Fitful Murmurs » Blog Archive » The California Supreme Court Are Not (Necessarily) Homophobes. Fri, 29 May 2009 04:56:03 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44402#comment-31731 [...] should point out here that I’m hardly a legal scholar.  But other people are, and many of their informed opinions match my rather-less informed [...] [...] should point out here that I’m hardly a legal scholar.  But other people are, and many of their informed opinions match my rather-less informed [...]

]]> http://washingtonindependent.com/44402/the-california-courts-reluctant-reasoning-in-upholding-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-34357 Craig Nelson Wed, 27 May 2009 00:29:52 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44402#comment-34357 With regard to the last para - I thought Iowa and Connecticut had also employed a suspect classification in regard to sexual orientation? With regard to the last para – I thought Iowa and Connecticut had also employed a suspect classification in regard to sexual orientation?

]]> http://washingtonindependent.com/44402/the-california-courts-reluctant-reasoning-in-upholding-prop-8/comment-page-1#comment-31569 Craig Nelson Tue, 26 May 2009 17:29:52 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44402#comment-31569 With regard to the last para - I thought Iowa and Connecticut had also employed a suspect classification in regard to sexual orientation? With regard to the last para – I thought Iowa and Connecticut had also employed a suspect classification in regard to sexual orientation?

]]>