<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama May Not Use Military Commissions After All?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogmafia</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all/comment-page-1#comment-277116</link>
		<dc:creator>blogmafia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43443#comment-277116</guid>
		<description>Thank you. Fine issues.I have added to your favorites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Fine issues.I have added to your favorites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New and Improved Military Commissions Or Due Process-Lite? &#124; News Fu</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all/comment-page-1#comment-31102</link>
		<dc:creator>New and Improved Military Commissions Or Due Process-Lite? &#124; News Fu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43443#comment-31102</guid>
		<description>[...] proposed, revamped military commissions. In a conference call with reporters yesterday, as reported by Daphne Eviatar, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First said that Obama might decide not to use military [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] proposed, revamped military commissions. In a conference call with reporters yesterday, as reported by Daphne Eviatar, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First said that Obama might decide not to use military [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APoliticsNow!&#187; Blog Archive &#187; New and Improved Military Commissions Or Due Process-Lite?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all/comment-page-1#comment-31101</link>
		<dc:creator>APoliticsNow!&#187; Blog Archive &#187; New and Improved Military Commissions Or Due Process-Lite?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43443#comment-31101</guid>
		<description>[...] proposed, revamped military commissions. In a conference call with reporters yesterday, as reported by Daphne Eviatar, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First said that Obama might decide not to use military [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] proposed, revamped military commissions. In a conference call with reporters yesterday, as reported by Daphne Eviatar, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First said that Obama might decide not to use military [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New and Improved Military Commissions Or Due Process-Lite?&#160;&#124;&#160;Bloggers For Change</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all/comment-page-1#comment-31100</link>
		<dc:creator>New and Improved Military Commissions Or Due Process-Lite?&#160;&#124;&#160;Bloggers For Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43443#comment-31100</guid>
		<description>[...] proposed, revamped military commissions. In a conference call with reporters yesterday, as reported by Daphne Eviatar, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First said that Obama might decide not to use military [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] proposed, revamped military commissions. In a conference call with reporters yesterday, as reported by Daphne Eviatar, Human Rights Watch and Human Rights First said that Obama might decide not to use military [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowerrung</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all/comment-page-1#comment-35970</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowerrung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43443#comment-35970</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with kangaroo courts?  Just put a uniform on one and hand him a set of scales.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s all that is required for justice right?  Actually I&#039;m surprised the Brass would go along with this.  &lt;br&gt;It certainly does not improve the US military standing either in the US or the World, and the recruiting for Al Qaeda still gets fodder to feed new recruits.  It just makes us look like a bunch of goons instead of the  professional soldiers that we are.  I resent that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess Obama is tired of hearing about these folks and wants to close Gitmo.  He still allows rendition, but apparently rendering 240 prisoners is a bit much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with kangaroo courts?  Just put a uniform on one and hand him a set of scales.</p>
<p>That&#39;s all that is required for justice right?  Actually I&#39;m surprised the Brass would go along with this.  <br />It certainly does not improve the US military standing either in the US or the World, and the recruiting for Al Qaeda still gets fodder to feed new recruits.  It just makes us look like a bunch of goons instead of the  professional soldiers that we are.  I resent that.</p>
<p>I guess Obama is tired of hearing about these folks and wants to close Gitmo.  He still allows rendition, but apparently rendering 240 prisoners is a bit much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowerrung</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43443/obama-may-not-use-military-commissions-after-all/comment-page-1#comment-31003</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowerrung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43443#comment-31003</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with kangaroo courts?  Just put a uniform on one and hand him a set of scales.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s all that is required for justice right?  Actually I&#039;m surprised the Brass would go along with this.  &lt;br&gt;It certainly does not improve the US military standing either in the US or the World, and the recruiting for Al Qaeda still gets fodder to feed new recruits.  It just makes us look like a bunch of goons instead of the  professional soldiers that we are.  I resent that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess Obama is tired of hearing about these folks and wants to close Gitmo.  He still allows rendition, but apparently rendering 240 prisoners is a bit much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with kangaroo courts?  Just put a uniform on one and hand him a set of scales.</p>
<p>That&#39;s all that is required for justice right?  Actually I&#39;m surprised the Brass would go along with this.  <br />It certainly does not improve the US military standing either in the US or the World, and the recruiting for Al Qaeda still gets fodder to feed new recruits.  It just makes us look like a bunch of goons instead of the  professional soldiers that we are.  I resent that.</p>
<p>I guess Obama is tired of hearing about these folks and wants to close Gitmo.  He still allows rendition, but apparently rendering 240 prisoners is a bit much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

