COINdinistas: Stop the Drone Violence!

By
Monday, May 18, 2009 at 9:08 am

Take a look at this New York Times op-ed call for a moratorium on the Pakistan drone strikes by counterinsurgency luminaries Andrew Exum and Dave Kilcullen. (This, if I’m not mistaken, is the furthest Kilcullen has gone: in a recent discussion of his book, “The Accidental Guerrilla” at a Center for a New American Security event and in April congressional testimony, he called for reducing American reliance on the drones or to think long and hard before their uses, not an outright halt. I could be overlooking something, of course.)

The basic argument is familiar to all COINdinistas: the strikes give the veneer of efficacy while sowing the seeds for long term instability; and a real strategy prioritizes the provision of security and services to the population rather than focusing on the elimination of an enemy who you’re probably not so good at distinguishing anyway.

Imagine, for example, that burglars move into a neighborhood. If the police were to start blowing up people’s houses from the air, would this convince homeowners to rise up against the burglars? Wouldn’t it be more likely to turn the whole population against the police? And if their neighbors wanted to turn the burglars in, how would they do that, exactly? Yet this is the same basic logic underlying the drone war.

The drone strategy is similar to French aerial bombardment in rural Algeria in the 1950s, and to the “air control” methods employed by the British in what are now the Pakistani tribal areas in the 1920s. The historical resonance of the British effort encourages people in the tribal areas to see the drone attacks as a continuation of colonial-era policies.

Most readers here are probably persuaded. I’d be interested in reading a reply from a smart conservative observer of Af-Pak like Bill Roggio. (Not that I know what Bill thinks about the drones.) The alternative to the drones, as Dave and Exum write, is an increased U.S.-supported reliance on Pakistani forces to provide security for the population; and heretofore those forces have shown little competence or capability in doing so.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

3 Comments

These Are Not The Drones You’re Looking For « Around The Sphere
Pingback posted May 18, 2009 @ 12:26 pm

[...] Spencer Ackerman [...]


christian louboutin 2010
Comment posted August 16, 2010 @ 3:42 am

christian louboutin, christian louboutin

christian louboutn knockoffs, christian louboutin knockoffs

herve leger replica dress, herve leger replica dress

herve leger replica bandage dress, herve leger replica bandage dress

herve leger replica dresses, herve leger replica dresses

christian louboutin knock offs, christian louboutin knock offs

christian louboutin knock off shoes, christian louboutin knock off shoes

herve leger skirt, herve leger skirt

herve leger skirt sale, herve leger skirt sale

herve leger skirt on sale, herve leger skirt on sale

herve leger dress knock off, herve leger dress knock off

herve leger dress discount, herve leger dress discount

herve leger wedding dress, herve leger wedding dress

christian louboutin heels, christian louboutin heels

christian louboutin heels sale, christian louboutin heels sale

christian louboutin heels uk, christian louboutin heels uk

louboutin knockoffs, louboutin knockoffs

christian louboutin high heels, christian louboutin high heels

christian louboutin mary janes, christian louboutin mary janes

christian louboutin wedges,christian louboutin wedges


Moon Hcz
Comment posted October 29, 2010 @ 7:52 am

.-supported reliance on Pakistani forces to provide security for the population; and heretofore


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.