<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Nominee Debate Defined by Conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffret cadeau weekend</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-288897</link>
		<dc:creator>coffret cadeau weekend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-288897</guid>
		<description>An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discount Louis Vuitton</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-191516</link>
		<dc:creator>Discount Louis Vuitton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-191516</guid>
		<description>As a result of the irrational fixation of Republicans on irrelevant issues, their credibility with the American electorate was seriously damaged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a result of the irrational fixation of Republicans on irrelevant issues, their credibility with the American electorate was seriously damaged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis vuitton handbags</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-184046</link>
		<dc:creator>louis vuitton handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-184046</guid>
		<description>Certainly empathy would weigh in on any Gitmo detainee question where there are results of a trial by military mockery or where the detainee was tortured. (for detainee read Prisoner)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly empathy would weigh in on any Gitmo detainee question where there are results of a trial by military mockery or where the detainee was tortured. (for detainee read Prisoner)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study confirms &#34;compassionate conservative&#34; is an oxymoron - Page 4 - Volconvo Debate Forums</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-155790</link>
		<dc:creator>Study confirms &#34;compassionate conservative&#34; is an oxymoron - Page 4 - Volconvo Debate Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 22:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-155790</guid>
		<description>[...] during the Sotomayor hearings, I find the use of the word in the current whine to be amusing.  Supreme Court Nominee Debate Defined by Conservatives   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] during the Sotomayor hearings, I find the use of the word in the current whine to be amusing.  Supreme Court Nominee Debate Defined by Conservatives   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the News &#8212; Goodwin Liu Disagrees with Conservative Charge against Judge Sotomayor</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-33947</link>
		<dc:creator>In the News &#8212; Goodwin Liu Disagrees with Conservative Charge against Judge Sotomayor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-33947</guid>
		<description>[...] The Washington Independent, May 18, 2009 by Aaron Wiener http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Washington Independent, May 18, 2009 by Aaron Wiener <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives" rel="nofollow">http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaiian style</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-35096</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaiian style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-35096</guid>
		<description>A Supreme Court Justice that has a strong sense of Empathy would indeed be interesting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will the Military Mockery trials at Gitmo be subject to judicial review?  Or will that be denied too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Certainly empathy would weigh in on any Gitmo detainee question where there are results of a trial by military mockery or where the detainee was tortured.  (for detainee read Prisoner)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Supreme Court Justice that has a strong sense of Empathy would indeed be interesting.</p>
<p>Will the Military Mockery trials at Gitmo be subject to judicial review?  Or will that be denied too.</p>
<p>Certainly empathy would weigh in on any Gitmo detainee question where there are results of a trial by military mockery or where the detainee was tortured.  (for detainee read Prisoner)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaiian style</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-31141</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaiian style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-31141</guid>
		<description>A Supreme Court Justice that has a strong sense of Empathy would indeed be interesting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will the Military Mockery trials at Gitmo be subject to judicial review?  Or will that be denied too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Certainly empathy would weigh in on any Gitmo detainee question where there are results of a trial by military mockery or where the detainee was tortured.  (for detainee read Prisoner)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Supreme Court Justice that has a strong sense of Empathy would indeed be interesting.</p>
<p>Will the Military Mockery trials at Gitmo be subject to judicial review?  Or will that be denied too.</p>
<p>Certainly empathy would weigh in on any Gitmo detainee question where there are results of a trial by military mockery or where the detainee was tortured.  (for detainee read Prisoner)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-31010</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-31010</guid>
		<description>Empathy is a good thing, a very good thing. But as soon as I heard Obama say that in regard to a SCOTUS nominee, I grimaced. I just knew the Republicants would seize on it. Obama is not smart all the time. Sometimes he&#039;s very tone deaf.&lt;br&gt;The GOP and most of the media don&#039;t do nuance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Empathy is a good thing, a very good thing. But as soon as I heard Obama say that in regard to a SCOTUS nominee, I grimaced. I just knew the Republicants would seize on it. Obama is not smart all the time. Sometimes he&#39;s very tone deaf.<br />The GOP and most of the media don&#39;t do nuance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-30930</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-30930</guid>
		<description>in the end the only real criteria is that it must have two X chromosomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the end the only real criteria is that it must have two X chromosomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Defend Empathy? &#171; Stephen C. Rose</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43327/supreme-court-nominee-debate-defined-by-conservatives/comment-page-1#comment-30913</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Defend Empathy? &#171; Stephen C. Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43327#comment-30913</guid>
		<description>[...] THIS WAS INSPIRED BY THE FOLLOWING FROM THE WASHINGTON INDEPENDENT Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Barack Visits The SupremesEnough of GOP Senate WingnutsFinish 2006, Republicans Go Down, Cut No SlackEmpathy: the lost trait [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] THIS WAS INSPIRED BY THE FOLLOWING FROM THE WASHINGTON INDEPENDENT Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Barack Visits The SupremesEnough of GOP Senate WingnutsFinish 2006, Republicans Go Down, Cut No SlackEmpathy: the lost trait [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

