rssZelikow Sums It Up
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 1:13 pm
- 3 Comments
During this morning’s Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on torture, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) who chaired the hearing, asked Philip Zelikow, the former state department adviser, about the reaction he received when he objected to the interrogation techniques approved by the Office of Legal Counsel. Whitehouse noted that “lawyers love to debate. It’s our nature to quarrel with other and exchange views.” So how did the Justice Department lawyers respond to Zelikow’s arguments?
“The arguments I was making were pretty profound,” answered Zelikow. “Because if I was right, their whole interpretation of the CID standard [the standard for "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment," forbidden by the Convention Against Torture and by the U.S. Constitution] was fundamentally unsound.”
So they had “a few options,” Zelikow said. One is, “let’s take another look at this” and see if there’s any validity to the different opinion, or, “they could say, Zelikow, this shows how rusty you are in practicing law. We need to tell you why you’ve misunderstood this area of the law.”
But in fact, said Zelikow, “they didn’t do any of those things.” They chose a third option. “They just said, ‘we don’t want to talk about it.’”
And it’s that third option — intentionally burying your head in the sand — that demonstrates bad faith and an intent to ignore the relevant law, as the legal ethics expert David Luban testified.
3 Comments
Pingback posted May 13, 2009 @ 11:48 pm
[...] Obviously, today’s hearing just scratched the surface of what we know happened thus far, but Soufan was strong and effective in shooting down the effectiveness argument, as was Zelikow in addressing the dubious legal reasoning and the internal politics that led to the torture memos. It can be summed up by Zelikow by way of Daphne Eviatar: [...]
Pingback posted April 1, 2010 @ 8:11 pm
[...] at SAIS; Philip D. Zelikow, diplomat and author who worked as executive director of the 9 …Zelikow Sums It Up The Washington IndependentName (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website … U.S., cia, David Luban, fbi, [...]
Comment posted June 9, 2011 @ 7:24 am
As for Boykin, I’m not really expressing correspondents ought to condemn your exAnd also Palin? Effectively, she will be okay along with spreading your podium along with Boykin Along with realize that Palin accepted appear using him or her along at the identical affairAt Palin’s occurrence tonight, pandora charms ukpandora ringsneither of them Palin none Boykin will talk about Islam, in accordance with the event’s organizer Steve AndrewsAnd Palin? Properly, she actually is okay by using giving pandorapandora braceletstogether with Boykin Bill Boykin (Oughout But there’s the pond of hate holding out to become broadcasted, as well as Boykin’s judgement connected with Islam and those who process the ideaIt’s great to view a get connected with Boykin’s assaults Pandora Banglesin Islam have inserted your line of thinking from the Colorado marketing when Palin will be scheduled to communicate in hereOhydrates AP documented: On Lt
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
