<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Reach Compromise on Cash-for-Clunkers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-34767</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-34767</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why there setting a maximum MPG of 18MPG to participate. They should only require that the car be 10 years old or older and the new car get better MPG.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why should it matter if you turn in a car that get 40MPG or 4MPG. Shouldn&#039;t the goal here be to get More MPG and get the economy going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know why there setting a maximum MPG of 18MPG to participate. They should only require that the car be 10 years old or older and the new car get better MPG.</p>
<p>Why should it matter if you turn in a car that get 40MPG or 4MPG. Shouldn&#39;t the goal here be to get More MPG and get the economy going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-31867</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-31867</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why there setting a maximum MPG of 18MPG to participate. They should only require that the car be 10 years old or older and the new car get better MPG.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why should it matter if you turn in a car that get 40MPG or 4MPG. Shouldn&#039;t the goal here be to get More MPG and get the economy going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know why there setting a maximum MPG of 18MPG to participate. They should only require that the car be 10 years old or older and the new car get better MPG.</p>
<p>Why should it matter if you turn in a car that get 40MPG or 4MPG. Shouldn&#39;t the goal here be to get More MPG and get the economy going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-30305</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-30305</guid>
		<description>What a farce!  I have a 1992 Lumina Z34 which gets about 13 mpg.  The original sticker says it should get 17/26.  I would love to trade it in on a new car with the $4500 incentive.  Oh well, guess I will have to keep it and its pollution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a farce!  I have a 1992 Lumina Z34 which gets about 13 mpg.  The original sticker says it should get 17/26.  I would love to trade it in on a new car with the $4500 incentive.  Oh well, guess I will have to keep it and its pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cash for clunkers goes off the rails &#124; Ryan Avent</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-30232</link>
		<dc:creator>Photomaniacal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cash for clunkers goes off the rails &#124; Ryan Avent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-30232</guid>
		<description>[...] a wonder it&#8217;s taken the US Congress so long to move ahead on such a bill. Too bad the actual legislation fails to live up to the plan&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a wonder it&#8217;s taken the US Congress so long to move ahead on such a bill. Too bad the actual legislation fails to live up to the plan&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outoreach</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-29948</link>
		<dc:creator>outoreach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-29948</guid>
		<description>ya its good blog &lt;br&gt;i need this info about blog&lt;br&gt;it is useful for me .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya its good blog <br />i need this info about blog<br />it is useful for me .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-29923</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-29923</guid>
		<description>Nothing this administration does seem right.You get $5000.00 for a clunker if you buy a $35000.00 dollar car.I bet Obama forces GM to make these Green Cars that no-one wants.If green cars end up being the only cars we can buy,they will be real expensive.You-ll be able to get a 1995 used car for $10,000.00 grand after people raise the prices(NEW CAR $50,000 or USED CAR $10,000.Every idea this guy comes up with SUCKS FOR US.He should of let us keep our green tech stimulas money,made incentives for green tech start ups,and let the Venture Capitalists take care of it.The Free Market will find us the best tech,for the least money(But I know how he loves to raise taxes,so that would never happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing this administration does seem right.You get $5000.00 for a clunker if you buy a $35000.00 dollar car.I bet Obama forces GM to make these Green Cars that no-one wants.If green cars end up being the only cars we can buy,they will be real expensive.You-ll be able to get a 1995 used car for $10,000.00 grand after people raise the prices(NEW CAR $50,000 or USED CAR $10,000.Every idea this guy comes up with SUCKS FOR US.He should of let us keep our green tech stimulas money,made incentives for green tech start ups,and let the Venture Capitalists take care of it.The Free Market will find us the best tech,for the least money(But I know how he loves to raise taxes,so that would never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Jensen</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-29892</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-29892</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. This is some BS.  I have a minivan that gets 17 MPG city and around 22 highway (I looked it up).  It is a 1992 model and most certainly would be traded in on something that gets over 35 MPG.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I&#039;m screwed because this car doesn&#039;t get worse than 18MPG if you average the city/highway driving? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, someone could drive a 18MPG truck could turn it in on a 22MPG guzzler and get their $3500.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That doesn&#039;t seem right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. This is some BS.  I have a minivan that gets 17 MPG city and around 22 highway (I looked it up).  It is a 1992 model and most certainly would be traded in on something that gets over 35 MPG.  </p>
<p>So I&#39;m screwed because this car doesn&#39;t get worse than 18MPG if you average the city/highway driving? </p>
<p>Meanwhile, someone could drive a 18MPG truck could turn it in on a 22MPG guzzler and get their $3500.</p>
<p>That doesn&#39;t seem right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/comment-page-1#comment-29799</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919#comment-29799</guid>
		<description>So what if I want to trade in my 1984 full size pickup in for a motorcycle that gets 60+ mpg?  No provisions for that?  Looks like I&#039;m paying for everyone else, again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what if I want to trade in my 1984 full size pickup in for a motorcycle that gets 60+ mpg?  No provisions for that?  Looks like I&#39;m paying for everyone else, again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

