Pakistani Government in Danger of Falling?

By
Friday, May 01, 2009 at 9:35 am

Not necessarily from the Taliban, but from a military coup responding to the threat the Taliban poses to the viability of Pakistan. Fox News reports that Gen. David Petraeus is telling people privately that the next two weeks (!) are a test of the Zardari government’s survivability. Anonymous sources allegedly familiar with Petraeus’ talks with members of Congress say that he thinks even if the Taliban sweep into Islamabad, the Army is ready to take over.

They said Petraeus and senior administration officials believe the Pakistani army, led by Chief of Staff Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, is “superior” to the civilian government, led by President Ali Zardari, and could conceivably survive even if Zardari’s government falls to the Taliban.  …

The officials who spoke with Petraeus, however, said he and they believe that even were Zardari’s government to fall, it was still conceivable that Kayani’s army could maintain control over the nuclear arsenal.

That is because the Pakistani arsenal is set up in such a way — with the weapons stockpile and activation mechanisms separated — so as to prevent easy access by invaders. Moreover, the Taliban is not believed at present to possess the sophisticated technical expertise necessary to exercise full “command and control” over a nuclear arsenal, and would probably require weeks if not months to develop it.

It would be naive to think that the Pakistani military, which ruled Pakistan for the past ten years until Pervez Musharraf resigned from the Army in November 2007 and formally relinquished power last August, doesn’t believe it could do a better job of governing than Asif Ali Zardari. And it would also be naive to think that the Obama administration is closed off to the prospect, whatever it might say about democracy. Andrew Exum wonders why the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has a “weird man crush” on Kayani. He might merely be prepared to bet on what he considers the stronger horse — not a strong horse, as the Pakistani army has been repeatedly beaten by the Pakistani Taliban and its allies, but a stronger one. It might also explain why Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy objects to making aid to Pakistan receivable only to “civilian authorities of a government of Pakistan constituted through a free and fair election,” among other provisions of conditionalized funding.

Next week representatives of the Pakistani government will be in Washington for the next round of trilateral talks with the Obama administration and the Afghan government. After this report, and with the Pakistani Taliban approaching the gates of Islamabad, it’ll seem like whistling past the Kayani government’s graveyard.

TWI is on Twitter. Please follow us here.

Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter


Comments

11 Comments

werewatching
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 7:14 am

Dont worry Obama will go down their and hang out with the Taliban,Tell them their not being nice,and every thing will be OK


Ben
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 8:20 am

Or there and they're even…


John
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 8:22 am

Why not just use “thar” and pretend you're a pirate? It sidesteps so much hardship for you and your readers.


Ben
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 8:23 am

Shiver me timbers!


werewatching
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 8:50 am

Whats up with these kooky conservatives.No one wants low taxes–No one wants Freedom to make money–No one wants Free markets to lift people out of poverty–We dont even need a Defense.If we leave people alone they will like us–No one likes God in this country–gays should marry,and incest should be legal–Why should i work for 100,000 a year when I can do nothing and make 20,000 for free.Im just joking,just trying to become a Liberal.


werewatching
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 9:07 am

No substance what-so -ever.Typical liberal jargon.When you become one of the new poor under this Socialistic Agenda,Ill still help you. your fellow american.


John
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 3:33 pm

Awesome.


Ben
Comment posted May 1, 2009 @ 6:03 pm

You mean:

Awesome, YARR!!


John
Comment posted May 2, 2009 @ 12:19 pm

SARRRRRRy! I guess I was too busy drooling over my semi-nude photo of Hillary Clinton from last month's Socialist Agenda.

Awesome, YARR!!


John
Comment posted May 2, 2009 @ 7:19 pm

SARRRRRRy! I guess I was too busy drooling over my semi-nude photo of Hillary Clinton from last month's Socialist Agenda.

Awesome, YARR!!


Round the World, and a Saudi Demand | TaylorMarsh.com
Pingback posted May 3, 2009 @ 12:36 pm

[...] But it’s obvious Pres. Zadari can’t handle the situation in Pakistan. Looks like George W. Bush’s “Musharaff policy” is going to unfold out on to the next Musharaff policy, with the military eventually taking over. At least that’s what I’ve been seeing as the likely end game here. Ackerman concurs. [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.