<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appeals Court Reinstates Torture Case Previously Dismissed on &#8216;State Secrets&#8217; Grounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1347281</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-301770</link>
		<dc:creator>1347281</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-301770</guid>
		<description>1347281 beers on the wall.  sck was here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1347281 beers on the wall.  sck was here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Foreign Secretary: Clinton threatened to cut-off intelligence-sharing if torture evidence is disclosed - Salon.com</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-256409</link>
		<dc:creator>British Foreign Secretary: Clinton threatened to cut-off intelligence-sharing if torture evidence is disclosed - Salon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 12:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-256409</guid>
		<description>[...] to argue that the torture program which victimized him must be kept secret, and then after the Obama DOJ lost in the Ninth Circuit, trying to get that decision reversed by the full Circuit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to argue that the torture program which victimized him must be kept secret, and then after the Obama DOJ lost in the Ninth Circuit, trying to get that decision reversed by the full Circuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Foreign Secretary: Clinton threatened to cut-off intelligence-sharing if torture evidence is disclosed</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-189348</link>
		<dc:creator>British Foreign Secretary: Clinton threatened to cut-off intelligence-sharing if torture evidence is disclosed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-189348</guid>
		<description>[...] to argue that the torture program which victimized him must be kept secret, and then after the Obama DOJ lost in the Ninth Circuit, trying to get that decision reversed by the full Circuit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to argue that the torture program which victimized him must be kept secret, and then after the Obama DOJ lost in the Ninth Circuit, trying to get that decision reversed by the full Circuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Still Fighting to Cover Up Rendition-to-Torture &#171; freedetainees.org</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-97245</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Still Fighting to Cover Up Rendition-to-Torture &#171; freedetainees.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-97245</guid>
		<description>[...] torture victims won a big victory when a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit court of appeals reinstated their lawsuit against a Boeing subsidiary for allegedly flying them to other countries to be tortured under the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] torture victims won a big victory when a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit court of appeals reinstated their lawsuit against a Boeing subsidiary for allegedly flying them to other countries to be tortured under the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Foreign Secretary: Clinton threatened to cut-off intelligence-sharing if torture evidence is disclosed &#171; Dr Nasir Khan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-57016</link>
		<dc:creator>British Foreign Secretary: Clinton threatened to cut-off intelligence-sharing if torture evidence is disclosed &#171; Dr Nasir Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-57016</guid>
		<description>[...] to argue that the torture program which victimized him must be kept secret, and then after the Obama DOJ lost in the Ninth Circuit, trying to get that decision reversed by the full Circuit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to argue that the torture program which victimized him must be kept secret, and then after the Obama DOJ lost in the Ninth Circuit, trying to get that decision reversed by the full Circuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoisted from [someone else's] Comments &#124; ???</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-30074</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoisted from [someone else's] Comments &#124; ???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-30074</guid>
		<description>[...] supported at the appeals level, given the repudiation of Bush called the 08 election. And one would assume correctly:   The logic of the state secrets privilege, the appeals court panel writes (pdf), “simply cannot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] supported at the appeals level, given the repudiation of Bush called the 08 election. And one would assume correctly:   The logic of the state secrets privilege, the appeals court panel writes (pdf), “simply cannot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Flatley</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-34975</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Flatley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 01:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-34975</guid>
		<description>On the one hand, Obama&#039;s justice department argued the same &quot;States secrets&quot; doctrine that the Bush administration had.  On the other hand, at his press conference, Obama seemed to back away from that.  This site had an interesting piece about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8&lt;/a&gt; but still I remain a little confused--and hopeful that Obama soon clarifies (and ultimately backs away from) his current stance on the states secrets&quot; doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, Obama&#39;s justice department argued the same &#8220;States secrets&#8221; doctrine that the Bush administration had.  On the other hand, at his press conference, Obama seemed to back away from that.  This site had an interesting piece about it <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8</a> but still I remain a little confused&#8211;and hopeful that Obama soon clarifies (and ultimately backs away from) his current stance on the states secrets&#8221; doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Flatley</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-29241</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Flatley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-29241</guid>
		<description>On the one hand, Obama&#039;s justice department argued the same &quot;States secrets&quot; doctrine that the Bush administration had.  On the other hand, at his press conference, Obama seemed to back away from that.  This site had an interesting piece about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8&lt;/a&gt; but still I remain a little confused--and hopeful that Obama soon clarifies (and ultimately backs away from) his current stance on the states secrets&quot; doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, Obama&#39;s justice department argued the same &#8220;States secrets&#8221; doctrine that the Bush administration had.  On the other hand, at his press conference, Obama seemed to back away from that.  This site had an interesting piece about it <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ddgps8</a> but still I remain a little confused&#8211;and hopeful that Obama soon clarifies (and ultimately backs away from) his current stance on the states secrets&#8221; doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good news: Appeals Court Reinstates Torture Case Previously Dismissed on &#8216;State Secrets&#8217; Grounds &#171; Later On</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40873/appeals-court-reinstates-torture-case-previously-dismissed-on-state-secrets-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-28864</link>
		<dc:creator>Good news: Appeals Court Reinstates Torture Case Previously Dismissed on &#8216;State Secrets&#8217; Grounds &#171; Later On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40873#comment-28864</guid>
		<description>[...] in Bush Administration, Government, Law, Obama administration, Torture at 1:56 pm by LeisureGuy Daphne Eviatar in the Washington Independent:  Despite the Obama administration’s surprisingly vigorous arguments that the case had to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Bush Administration, Government, Law, Obama administration, Torture at 1:56 pm by LeisureGuy Daphne Eviatar in the Washington Independent:  Despite the Obama administration’s surprisingly vigorous arguments that the case had to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

