Bankers Turn Off Campaign Cash Spigot

By
Monday, April 27, 2009 at 6:00 am

wallstreet

Since the financial industry bailouts began, Wall Street and Washington have never looked closer. But as the recession deepens and banks grow to resent the stigma associated with taxpayer aid, an unexpected chill is occurring: Bank employees are slamming their checkbooks shut.

Individual executives and workers at the 10 biggest beneficiaries of the TARP bailout donated slightly more than $31,000 to congressional campaigns and party committees during the first quarter of this year, according to a Washington Independent analysis of campaign finance reports filed with the Federal Election Commission.

Image by: Matt Mahurin

Image by: Matt Mahurin

Moreover, the total donations from employees at the top five banks receiving TARP capital – Detroit automakers were excluded – is less than three percent of what they were during a similar period in the 2008 election cycle.

The bleak economy is undoubtedly a factor in the drop, but it appears that lawmakers as well as bankers are in agreement with the CEO of JP Morgan Chase, who quipped recently that the bailout was a “scarlet letter” he could not wait to shed.

Citigroup employees, for example, were the TARP’s second-largest congressional donors so far this year, contributing $5,450. But that number represents just 5 percent of the employee giving that occurred in the first quarter of the election cycle that just ended, when Citigroup employees gave $128,405 to lawmakers’ campaigns and party committees.

“Members of Congress really don’t want to get in the press taking money from Bank of America right after they doled out money to Bank of America,” said Craig Holman, legislative representative for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch. “And that’s perfectly understandable.”

Indeed, several senior Democrats – including Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) – already have forsworn campaign contributions from the political action committees, known as PACs, of banks receiving TARP assistance.

But apart from House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), lawmakers have avoided any ban on donations from individual bank executives. And with good reason; even campaign finance watchdogs see no problem with the employees of TARP participants exercising their constitutional right to give to congressional campaigns.

Still, the bottom has fallen out of the boom in election-season largess from bank workers. The largest amount of donations coming from a single TARP beneficiary during the first three months of this year was the $6,100 given by employees at Morgan Stanley (see chart).

bank-employee-givingThat number is decidedly off-pace from the contribution rate at Morgan during the 2008 election, when employees gave $910,400 to congressional candidates and party committees alone – excluding donations to presidential campaigns and the company PAC.

The donation data analyzed by The Washington Independent excludes money given to 2008 presidential campaigns, state- and county-level political committees, and company PACs – although PAC donations from bailed-out banks also are down by about one-third for the first quarter of 2009, according to Holman. Winnowing out those three types of donations allows for a specific look at how bailed-out bank employees view members of Congress this year.

“You could see that there would be a logic[al reason], with the government playing such a large role in their sector, for them to be giving a fair amount of money,” observed Meredith McGehee, policy director at the Campaign Legal Center.

So why are bank workers shrugging at the Capitol Hill money chase? Perhaps, McGehee replied, for the same reason that most ordinary Americans wouldn’t give to their favorite member of Congress: they’re strapped for cash.

“These are people that made lots and lots of money” in the past, she said. “[Now] those who have not lost their jobs fear they will, and in this case the desire to spend their own money on political contributions is not so great.”

Rising economic insecurity on Wall Street, where lost financial-industry jobs are already estimated at more than 20,000, is one possible reason for the slide in donations. Another is the “scarlet letter” factor, as JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon put it to reporters earlier this month (not long after he jokingly presented Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner with a fake check repaying his bank’s bailout money).

As the personal lives of bailed-out executives attract more scrutiny from the media and more frustration from the public, even mid-level bank workers may be fearful of undue attention paid to their political giving patterns. After furious lawmakers castigated AIG CEO Edward Liddy over the company’s $450 million bonus payouts, AIG employees began receiving threats of strangulation with piano wire and violence against their children.

“A lot of it has to do with keeping a low profile, not becoming a target of AIG-type speculation,” reasoned Bill Allison, senior fellow at the non-profit Sunlight Foundation. “If you give now, you may be putting a big neon light over your head.”

In fact, AIG offers a stark picture of the plunge in personal giving by bailed-out bank employees. No donations were reported from within the troubled firm’s ranks during the first quarter of 2009, compared with more than $226,000 in congressional contributions from AIG workers during the 2008 election season.

The same pattern is visible at Merrill Lynch and Wachovia, which were both bought by competitors last year in shotgun marriages orchestrated by the government. Despite the banks’ escape from imminent bankruptcy, donations from employees remain notably low.

Wachovia workers and executives sent $2,520 to Capitol Hill campaigns during the first quarter of this year, or less than 1 percent of the company’s $368,200 in individual donations ahead of last year’s election.

An even bigger drop occurred at Merrill, where workers and executives have given $3,250 to campaigns so far this year after pouring $93,600 into congressional coffers during the same period in the 2008 election cycle – when their total giving topped $976,200.

But the downturn in contributions from bank executives and workers should not be mistaken for a diminishment in Wall Street’s long-term influence. The current lull also may be driven by the financial industry’s acceptance of newly heightened regulations as a foregone conclusion, while other industries gear up to fend off still-uncertain government involvement.

“I’m not sure there’s quite the same [volume of] talk of rewriting the rules that there is in health care,” Allison, of the Sunlight Foundation, said. “The bank battle is more midstream.”

Even the most outspoken inter-office critic of the bailout — AIG vice-president Jake DeSantis, who wrote a New York Times op-ed defending his performance — is a lapsed campaign donor.

DeSantis gave $2,100 to Dodd at the very beginning of the 2008 election, after donating the same amount to ex-Rep. Nancy Johnson (R-CT) during the 2006 cycle. This year, FEC reports show that he gave nothing.

Elana Schor is a freelance political reporter in Washington, DC. She has previously written for Talking Points Memo, The Guardian and The Hill.

Comments

20 Comments

Money York April China | World News
Pingback posted April 27, 2009 @ 7:45 am

[...] a fair amount of money,” observed Meredith McGehee, policy director at the Campaign Legal Center [...]GAKONA at the Palais de Tokyo in Paris – we make money not art By Regine on April 27, 2009 9:47 AM. [...]


TheTradingReport » Blog Archive » Wall Street Shuts Off Money Supply To Capitol Hill
Pingback posted April 27, 2009 @ 9:32 am

[...] In a move that may surprise a lot of folks, Wall Street reduced its political giving to just a few tiny drips in the first quarter of 2008. The total donations from employees at the top five banks receiving TARP capital was down 97% from the first quarter of 2007, according to an investigation by the Washington Independent. [...]


Bailout and Financial Crisis News » Wall Street Shuts Off Money Supply To Capitol Hill
Pingback posted April 27, 2009 @ 11:40 am

[...] // In a move that may surprise a lot of folks, Wall Street reduced its political giving to just a few tiny drips in the first quarter of 2008. The total donations from employees at the top five banks receiving TARP capital was down 97% from the first quarter of 2007, according to an investigation by the Washington Independent. [...]


America the FREE
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 1:43 pm

Return all TARP money ASAP..Get the government out of the market before this country is BROKEN.Socialism can not be allowed in this country.Since of interrigation memo release,the next president will be able to prosecute these guys for trying to change our central government…the citizens have also awaken from strange brainwashing.New Rasmussan poll says 77% of Americans want Free Market Capitalism.That leaves only 23% wanting mass poverty.THANK JESUS.


America the FREE
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 4:53 pm

Anything not agreeing with administration gets taken off this page.


Bank Employees Stop Giving to Campaigns? | All about MICROSOFT
Pingback posted April 27, 2009 @ 6:28 pm

[...] admin on Apr.27, 2009, under Microsoft Here’s a man bites dog story. The Washington Independent has reported that banker employees  have turned off the cash spigot to federal candidates, with [...]


Evening Reading: GM’s New, New Plan for Survival - Deal Journal - WSJ
Pingback posted April 27, 2009 @ 11:30 pm

[...] Donations flowing from bank employees is down 97% from first quarter 2007, the Washington Independent reports. [...]


Trade Jim News » Evening Reading: GM’s New, New Plan for Survival
Pingback posted April 27, 2009 @ 11:40 pm

[...] Donations flowing from bank employees is down 97% from first quarter 2007, the Washington Independent reports. [...]


Evening Reading: GM’s New, New Plan for Survival | OptionHustler.com
Pingback posted April 28, 2009 @ 1:00 am

[...] Donations flowing from bank employees is down 97% from first quarter 2007, the Washington Independent reports. [...]


Wall Street Journal » Blog Archive » Evening Reading: GM’s New, New Plan for Survival
Pingback posted April 28, 2009 @ 1:54 am

[...] Donations flowing from bank employees is down 97% from first quarter 2007, the Washington Independent reports. [...]


Evening Reading: GM’s New, New Plan for Survival | Blogoboro.com Blogs
Pingback posted April 28, 2009 @ 6:00 am

[...] Donations flowing from bank employees is down 97% from first quarter 2007, the Washington Independent reports. [...]


Money Campaign Beer Magazine | World News
Pingback posted May 4, 2009 @ 3:38 am

[...] a fair amount of money,” observed Meredith McGehee, policy director at the Campaign Legal Center [...]GAKONA at the Palais de Tokyo in Paris – we make money not art By Regine on April 27, 2009 9:47 AM. [...]


Recipients of Federal Funds Cut Down On Federal Lobbying : Political News
Pingback posted May 5, 2009 @ 11:18 am

[...] experts, including the Sunlight Foundation’s Bill Allison, speculated in a story by the Washington Independent this week about why contributions from employees of financial institutions may be so low (the [...]


Recipients of Federal Funds Cut Down On Federal Lobbying » Stupidica
Pingback posted May 14, 2009 @ 8:11 pm

[...] experts, including the Sunlight Foundation’s Bill Allison, speculated in a story by the Washington Independent this week about why contributions from employees of financial institutions may be so low (the [...]


The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room » MORNING READ
Pingback posted June 19, 2009 @ 6:22 pm

[...] THE BLOGS: The worm turns – Megan McArdle The blue-ing of the 20th – Jimmy Vielkind, PoliticsDaily Bankers turn off donation spigot – Elana Schor, Wash. Independent WaPo’s front page editorial – Dean Baker, Beat the Press Swine flu [...]


KorbinSigmund
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 5:48 pm

In speaking with finance managers and dealers, I have found one clear difference between those who are successful with their special finance departments and those who are not: successful special finance managers do not pre-judge leads. They all follow a very simple strategy- everyone is called until such time it is determined the lead cannot or will not buy!


KorbinSigmund
Comment posted November 23, 2009 @ 10:48 pm

That will have a great impact.


adidas originals
Comment posted June 5, 2010 @ 1:33 am

Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.


christian louboutin shoes
Comment posted June 8, 2010 @ 2:29 pm

thanks for your shareing

Fashion legancy– we sell famous brand christian louboutin

100% Authentic, 50% discount cheap christian louboutin shoes.

christian louboutin shoes authentic hot sell online, welcome for retail and wholesale christian louboutin,
christian shoes, louboutin shoesorders.

24 hours/day customer service online, louboutin paypal accepted.

Hi, I like to lose weight!
thanks for your shareing
Recently so many people who want to lose weight choose this style shoes– mbt shoes!

we call it massaqi shoes, it is special design have lose weight function.

come to our website, and choose cheap mbt shoes online, 65% discount mbt shoes Cheap MBT Shoes sale online.

welcome for retail and wholesale mbt shoes orders.


louis vuitton handbags
Comment posted August 7, 2010 @ 2:58 am

That will have a great impact.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.