A Blast from Charles Johnson’s Past

By
Monday, April 27, 2009 at 8:50 am

My story about Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs turning on the more extreme members of the right-wing anti-terrorism blogosphere is prompting commentary from other “warbloggers” who have worried about their fringes and done occasional “purges” from their movements. Joshua Trevino comments that “lost in the shrill din of the anti-jihadists is the woeful truth that there is such a thing as jihad, and it does demand a policy response.”

Charles Johnson’s disenchantment with a movement he did much to create is more likely a function of his contrary nature than his active conscience, but it would be ungracious to pry overmuch. The sad truth is that the self-proclaimed anti-jihadists, as a group, have done a great deal to discredit themselves in the past decade.

One thing I left on the cutting room floor, but tried to imply with some context and references, was just how comfortable Johnson was back in 2004, 2005 and 2006 with the people he is now crusading against.

It made sense, and to an extent it was the function of the “everybody on board” mentality that gripped the political blogospheres before the collapse of the Bush presidency. But it’s striking reading Johnson’s old posts now. From November 9, 2004, reacting to the banning of far-right Dutch Belgian party Vlaams Blok:

While it’s hard to approve of every one of Vlaams Blok’s policies, there’s also no denying that this is very much a victory for European Islamic supremacist groups such as the openly radical, terror-supporting Arab-European League—because almost no one else opposes them.

From February 11, 2006:

Atlas Shrugs is a year old today! Happy blogoversary, Pamela.

From July 17, 2006:

Atlas Shrugs has great coverage and lots of photographs of the Stand With Israel Rally in New York City.

From November 18, 2007:

Tonight’s recommended book is Robert Spencer’s detailed, relentlessly factual comparison of Islam and Christianity, examining the history and the ideologies behind the question: Religion of Peace? Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t.

UPDATE: Johnson links, and points out one error (which I’ve corrected) while arguing that his friendly comments about some people he’s now shunned were “from a different time” and fairly innocuous. All the same, it’s interesting to read those old posts and get a sense of how much that side of the blogosphere has changed.

Follow David Weigel on Twitter


Comments

42 Comments

Ben Hur
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 2:58 pm

It's 2009.


Dianna
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 3:19 pm

I don't understand – are you saying that no one has a right to change their views when they discover other facts?

How very strange, and dangerous.


Tuffy
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 3:20 pm

Plain and simple. He's a liberal and EVERYTHING is relevant to liberals. Oh, it's 2009…time to change my “conservative” views because 9/11 happened 8 years ago, and that's …like in the past…. Duh. Makes perfect sense.


Kevitivity
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 3:22 pm

The old posts you “uncovered” were made long before Pamela Geller began supporting the European neo-Nazi movement. Once Geller went full-crazy, Charles correctly distanced himself.


Tuffy
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 3:27 pm

PS…Notice all of his bootlickers rushing to defend him on here because he “conveniently” posted this link on his website so they can *wink* read about it. Charles does this every time he needs someone to defend him. The old “post-a-link-to-my-website so my followers can-vote/defend me-trick”. They fall in line evvvvery time.


jeppo
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 3:47 pm

Well lookee here, it seems that Charles and his lizards were enthusiastic supporters of “Nazis” less than two years ago.


CL
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 3:51 pm

What exactly is your point? Is it that once you've made a positive association with somebody, you can never change your mind? Because if not, I fail to see anything remotely controversial about it. Let's not forget that Gellar and Spencer were also on good terms with Johnson at one point, and now they are not. Are they also guilty of some sort of dishonesty or hypocrisy in the matter?

They used to get along. Now they don't. No one who made it through grade school should find this unusual. Time to move on.


stuuuudent
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 3:58 pm

How does that link show any kind of support for the guy, much less enthusiastic support? It is sarcasm more easily interpreted as being against the opponents of his action than being for the action. Furthermore, even if the blog's author does support the action, it does not imply support for the person behind it.


Mike
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 4:09 pm

So when she was only partly crazy she was OK?


jeppo
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 4:10 pm

Read the comments.


Johnson is a Loon
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 4:36 pm

Oh noes, here comes the cult of Charles!

We wuv u Charles, ur the bestest, we'd give our lives for u!

(Does sitting around and posting COMMENTS all day on ONE site make you a complete loser? I say yes. So any Lizards with more than 20K comments, you really, really, really need to get a life)


Sue
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 4:39 pm

Charles Johnson is the past. Little Green Footballs is the past. His blog has tanked and he's having a hard time reeling in new lizards. His latest rantings about Fox News and Glenn Beck are proof positive of Charles becoming unhinged more and more everyday.

His blog is no longer relavant and he is no longer relavant in the blogosphere.


Anon
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 4:40 pm

It seems a bit disingenuous for Charles Johnson to hold others to a much higher standard than he holds himself. People have been kicked off his own site, without reprieve, for one off-hand comment that he doesn't like, or sometimes for simply “minusing” one of his posts – he holds them completely punishable for anything they say, but apparently doesn't consider it fair when his own comments are judged by the same standards.


AnonyMous
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 4:54 pm

Please disregard oppej. He still has sand in his vajayjay over being banned at LGF.


km
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 5:51 pm

Yes those comments are illuminating for how much the mind set has changed at LGF.


Leo
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 5:57 pm

So you've found some things in the past he now claims to be not proud of.

Surely it is easier to accept someone who admits to being ignorant and has since wisened up as being the good guy, instead of demonising him further?

Look, in 2004, 2005 and 2006 you had Democrats claiming to be against the war but voting for Bush's policies to keep funding it.

We all do things we're not proud of. Charles Johnston has at least the balls to stand up and say that.

He mayn't be a shining beacon, but at least he's trying to make up for past mistakes – a lot better than most other people from the left and right blogosphere that have gotten more and more radical as time went by.


Yup
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 6:15 pm

You've discovered what the vast number of former (i.e. banned) members of LGF have discovered: that Charles Johnson is a huge hypocrite with an ego the size of the moon.


Tuffy
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 6:16 pm

Leo, you're argument is missing ONE key point. Charles Johnson NEVER admits when he's wrong. Nice try trying to defend him though.


ChenZhen
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 7:43 pm

David-

I've found at least one Geller thread that Johnson has scrubbed from LGF completely. It's the one that linked to her antics with Cindy Sheehan (from July 2007):

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs…

(scroll down to the bottom of the post, and you will discover that this entire thread: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=2… , no longer exists)

So perhaps he is a little embarrassed, contrary to the “people change” line he posted in response to your piece here.


Isaac
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 7:48 pm

Fun stuff is happening on at LGF2 ( http://www.littlegreenfootballs2.com/category/lgf/ ) including some interesting takes on David Weigel's article here. They refer to him, behind his back, as 'Charles “Nancy” Johnson' or simply as 'Cap'n Queeg' — how did Charles Johnson get so many enemies?


Rodan
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 8:21 pm

Charles Johnson is a 2 face backstabber. He wants acceptance from the “mainstream” and threw his former allies under the bus. He is nothing but a tool of the Leftists-Islamic alliance. Notice he never goes after Keith Olbermann or Think Progress?


Charles Johnson
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 8:26 pm

I am keep tracking on all who are defaming me. I have unlimited resources and will play hard ball. Take this as a warning, I always win.


Rodan
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 8:35 pm

Isaac,
Charles is a coward. He will not leave his Cult-Blog to debate. I would call him to his face, Nancy.


Isaac
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 8:59 pm

good point.


Isaac
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 9:18 pm

So he's scrubbing the posts from the past that disagree with his present meme. Others have tried, and failed, to change history: http://www.tc.umn.edu/~hick0088/classes/csci_21… by removing references.


Byron the Aussie
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 9:19 pm

Watching Charles' meltdown over the last twelve months has been a saddening experience. But it was always on the cards. So much of LGF is *my* music preferences, *my* photography, how far *I* cycled today, and *my* opinions. My guess is he has no-one in his life to keep him on an even keel. Who really has the time to moderate his own website for countless hours a week, except an obsessive? To now be caught posting fauxtography himself redefines irony. Nonetheless – like Pat Buchanan – he's done so much great work in the past all true conservatives will forever be in his debt.


Dave Weigel Digs Through LGF’s Archives Looking for Dirt | Weblogs
Pingback posted April 27, 2009 @ 10:55 pm

[...] Dave Weigel takes a few shots at me today, by digging up some old LGF posts (I’m getting used to this technique, from all sides): The Washington Independent » A Blast from Charles Johnson’s Past. [...]


ChenZhen
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 10:39 pm

Well, yeah. Geller posting pictures of herself flipping the bird to people was kinda nutty and childish, and the fact that the LGFers not only hadn't figured it out (as of July '07), but were laughing along with her was something that Johnson would rather forget, apparently.

Who knows what else has been scrubbed.


LoafingOaf
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 11:15 pm

I'm glad Charles is distancing himself for some of the scummier low-lifes of the right wing. There were an awul lot of digsusting people who latched on to LGF for awhile and I always thought it was a shame that Charles was associated with them. Because I've never found Charles to be a bigot or a fascist at all. many of his readers have been over the years. Charles did the right thing having his Orwell moment and taking a stand against them.

It also should not be underestimated how much Charles posts about evolution have ticked off the Religious Right. But Charles has nothing to apologize for there. Evolution happens to be truth….


Henrik R Clausen
Comment posted April 28, 2009 @ 3:20 am

Charles doesn't even know what a 'fascist' is. It's easier to blame random people for fascism if you can plead ignorance on the subject. Too much knowledge would ruin a perfectly good blogwar.

Let's take apart one example:

“The only post Weigel dug up that I honestly regret was one from 2004 expressing qualified approval of Vlaams Blok (the neofascist group that morphed into Vlaams Belang), when they were banned by the Belgian government.”

Now, let's see… Vlaams Blok was not a 'neofascist group'. It was a conservative, nationalist and separatist political party. Not 'group', 'party'. Big one, too. Vlaams Blok was not banned by the Belgian government. First, in countries with anything like separation of powers (yes, this concept is fading away in most places), courts ban groups, not governments.

Belgium, while dubious WRT the Rule of Law, still uses courts in matters such as this.

Now, talking of Belgium… CJ is probably not aware that Belgium is not a nation-state, it is a political union created by force in 1831. There are four ethnic groups in Belgium, only two of which matter in this context, the Walloons and the Flemish. The Dutch-speaking Flemish used to be the somewhat backward majority in the north, with the French-speaking Walloons in the south dominating the administration and doing what they can to quell any calls for Flemish independence. This has been the situation since the formation of Belgium.

The Walloon administration is still using its dominance in administration to take pot shots at Flemish independence movements – currently the Vlaams Belang, previously the Vlaams Blok. What happened in 2004 was that one member was convicted (in a dubious court case) of racism, and the peculiar construction of Belgian law was such that any member of Vlaams Blok would be exposed to similar cases due to this conviction. Thus, Vlaams Blok had to be dissolved and a successor party created.

This is the usual stuff that takes place when an independence movement is harrassed by the central government of a state it wishes to see dissolved. Recent cases against VB members Bart Debie and Frank Verhecke follow a similar pattern.

Enter Charles Johnson. He decides that VB (either of them) was/is a fascist movement and that anyone of other opinions are fascist-supporters, fascist-enablers and eurofascists. He's clueless about actual history and politics in Europe, and Belgium in particular. There's no reason to take his slurs seriously.


Henrik R Clausen
Comment posted April 28, 2009 @ 3:27 am

There's no large European neo-Nazi movement. Except in the mind of CJ. Go there if you want to see it.


Whig
Comment posted April 28, 2009 @ 6:40 am

This `evidence' provided by the writer of Johnson's links to someone he disavows now is pretty weak.

Johnson is not responsible for the content of Atlas Shrugs or Jihad Watch. If he made a couple of links to them years ago – one of which was to congratulate the blog on its first anniversay – so what?

He subsequently learned that these bloggers were playing kissy-face with fascists, and he made his disagreements about this known.

Johnson has oodles more integrity than this writer, who attempts to smear by association. A real class act.


awake
Comment posted April 28, 2009 @ 9:24 am

“Johnson has oodles more integrity than this writer, who attempts to smear by association.”

The irony is certainly not lost on me, Whig. You criticize Weigl for engaging in guilt by association when that is EXACTLY what Charles Johnson does.


Henrik R Clausen
Comment posted April 28, 2009 @ 11:22 am

Looks like some people see fascists everywhere. It's true. They're under the beds, over the rooftops, in the supermarket, serving your beer, fixing your car, writing your newspapers, mending the fences, nursing the ill, growing the corn.

Or, perhaps not. Perhaps it's just people, and a blogger with a twisted mind.


The Name-Jackers Are At It Again | Weblogs
Pingback posted April 28, 2009 @ 4:47 pm

[...] name-jacker also appears at the Washington Independent, along with a few other vitriol-spewing morons, and an apologist for [...]


God
Comment posted April 29, 2009 @ 8:38 am

Liar.


Mary
Comment posted April 29, 2009 @ 12:29 pm

Like Christopher Hitchens and the bloggers at the leftist-British “Harry's Place”, Charles Johnson is more anti-fascist than anti-Islam. Anti–fascists don't belong to either “side” of the blogosphere.

“Fascism” is usually defined by anti-fascists as a kind of genocidal authoritarianism based on racism. This definition isn't exact, and it ignores fascism's history as an economic/political infrastructure, but using the term “fascist” rather than “genocidal authoritarianism based on racism but not always on a corporate/nationalist economic and political infrastructure” makes for easier writing (and reading).

That’s why Johnson opposes (and has always opposed) European leanings towards “Fascism” as well as “Fascism” in the Muslim world.


God
Comment posted April 29, 2009 @ 3:38 pm

Liar.


Mary
Comment posted April 29, 2009 @ 7:29 pm

Like Christopher Hitchens and the bloggers at the leftist-British “Harry's Place”, Charles Johnson is more anti-fascist than anti-Islam. Anti–fascists don't belong to either “side” of the blogosphere.

“Fascism” is usually defined by anti-fascists as a kind of genocidal authoritarianism based on racism. This definition isn't exact, and it ignores fascism's history as an economic/political infrastructure, but using the term “fascist” rather than “genocidal authoritarianism based on racism but not always on a corporate/nationalist economic and political infrastructure” makes for easier writing (and reading).

That’s why Johnson opposes (and has always opposed) European leanings towards “Fascism” as well as “Fascism” in the Muslim world.


2 Promo 2005 Saturn Relay Automatic Transmission, Chrysler Voyager Oil Filter Location
Pingback posted May 20, 2010 @ 11:25 am

[...] 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940412 Promo 2005 Saturn Relay Automatic Transmission, Chrysler Voyager Oil Filter Location2 Promo 2005 Saturn Relay Automatic Transmission, Chrysler Voyager Oil Filter Locationsafari lodges sale african kruger national park lemans coolant product description sc300 coupon selection chrysler lebaron auto auction galactic federation of light airport ford expedition repair forum automotive 300se accommodation mercedes saturn ion 2 discount fender sedan cheap bb cancun b vacation dmx sql data mining extensions moes auction k30 collection blue book pioneer dvd burner software canadian aviation administration scottish grand national 2010 collision repair estimates grand theft auto 3 playstation 2 honda civic navigation video nexcare waterproof bee abrasion b cover discount mercedes 280e ignition coil maruti automatic transmission 960 engine conversion volvo s80 publication 515 repair ion 1 part capa certified primered 4cyl l suzuki motorcycles amplifier installation s ion 2 platform miata instruction smart parts redz ion infusion d iris discount new mexico graduation summit sl1 abbreviations youtube knitting headlight selection altezza lights honda civic c2500 installation manifold guitar center audix fusion 7 gm ignition parts brattain international used trucks crossfire led selection new york home publication l7 used transmissions e510 headlight collision dodge d100 collection sale ram 4500 association discount at ford expedition ranch savana 1500 conversion van all wheel drive caution 1 part wiper blade social security disability conditions rca htib 350 crobar specification angel fire accommodation grenada television radiator relocation kit sportwagon transmission 2010 cadillac cts v s series radiator transmission cooler g25 transmission brake and clutch catalina vacation rentals hamilton cove ocean views 1999 2500 chevrolet suburban for sale air conditioning adobe creative suite 4 master collection crack torrent emissions hyundai coupe 1.6 plymouth valiant used automatic transmission convertible top 325e information 1993 eurovan transmission used volkswagen greece national costume is300 promotion guaranteed starfire auction worldwide fender skirts replacement adirondack chair patio furniture cushions pick up radiator transmission engine oil cooler latitude d400 specifications installation canal power ram 50 cheap air conditioner blower international student design competition american society mechanical engineers full wildcat formation see ion mpg blub aftermarket suspension companies body kits parts gmc p35 p3500 van proportioning valve safety job description nissan 360z suspension shocks struts part national biodiesel board commercial renewable fuels junction 10 wall outline installation disney abc television group all star party racing auction ignition coil suppliers china 1964 chevy ii front suspension smart parts dynasty ion paintball gun shocks for 2003 saturn ion l7c sale lithium ion battery motorola slvr l7 scirocco promotion racing par30 aftermarket promotion 25 high performance subdivisions acm siggraph 300sl episode promotion kenmore air conditioning parts shipping ford excursion subaru rx for adoption mazda mizer installation always journeys aftermarket selection ml63 amg installation w164 ltd parts plastic injection automotive international inc silverado 3500 hd transmission duramax diesel buoyant surface jet interpretation yukon river monte carlo restoration parts 72 chevy Is300 Promo 4dr | T1000 Price Sparc | Schick Tracer Fx | Skechers Vigor A | Lw300 Ice Lw200 | [...]


adidas originals
Comment posted June 4, 2010 @ 7:26 am

Thanks for this interesting post,i like it.


Charles Johnson Uses Twitter to Push ‘Racist’ Smear of Red State’s Josh Trevino : The Other McCain
Pingback posted July 4, 2010 @ 12:45 pm

[...] too extreme in their rhetoric even before Johnson and LGF turned on Geller, et al. And, as Weigel noted in a follow-up post, Johnson’s qualms about Belgian nationalism hadn’t prevented him from lamenting the [...]


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.