Maybe Steven Chu Was Stumped After All
Thursday, April 23, 2009 at 3:29 pm
I was more than a little incredulous when I read that Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) claimed via Twitter to have stumped Energy Secretary Steven Chu with a simple science question. After all, Chu is a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, while Barton doesn’t exactly have the firmest grasp of science. And, having witnessed the exchange firsthand at yesterday’s Energy and Commerce Committee hearing, I can say that it was Barton, not Chu, who came across as rather clueless.
But then I reviewed the photos I took at the hearing. Turns out Chu may have been a bit baffled after all:
Follow Aaron Wiener on Twitter
7 Comments
Comment posted April 23, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
Looks to me like Chu's trying to keep a straight face.
Comment posted April 23, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
As a geologist, his answer left a lot to be desired in clarity and specificity. However, he did get the general idea correct. Science is hard, and being a physicist doesn't make you an expert in geology. So I cut the man some slack.
The question did reveal Barton's total lack of understanding though. Not sure if he was going for a global warming angle here? Either way it was totally incoherent. Maybe Chu was just thrown off by the lack of any kind of logic…
Comment posted April 24, 2009 @ 1:27 am
He looks like he's making an effort to not respond to the Honorable Representative as he would a little kid.
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 2:07 pm
Alaska was near the equator millions of years ago and it did indeed drift up to the North Pole.
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 9:07 pm
Alaska was near the equator millions of years ago and it did indeed drift up to the North Pole.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss