Comments on: Holder Affirms Rule of Law, Won’t Say How He’ll Enforce It

By: Cerita Dewasa

Cerita Dewasa — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:50:06 +0000

Hi, thanks for the post, I agree with most of it and

some of it people might see as ‘controversial’.
I look forward to reading more of your postings soon...

Thankyou.

By: Bokep 3gp

Bokep 3gp — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:02:27 +0000

“We are a nation of laws” but only if its convenient?
“We are a nation of laws” but only if the world won't forget the crimes?

Attorney General Holder??? President Obama!!!?

By: BEN1234

BEN1234 — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:44:06 +0000

From what I could assimilate fom the article, in regard to Eric Holder views and the writers comments drawing readers attension to the salient point where eric hollder either missed to apply his mind or missed to elaborate or even intentioally avoided to expain the details. Therefore, it will be seen that though Mr. Eric Hollader is an exponent of international law to be applicable on USA as is on other countries of the world. All said and done, there are issues where in, Atrroney Generals finds difficult to meet the two end difficult. As the idea of International law to be applicable on USA is contrary to many of his own controversial statement regarding the Justice department
Ultimately everything boils down to one thing, and that is the immediate need of a thorough over haul of the Justice system with a view to bring confromity with the system of proper rule of law keeping enough scope to adopt the provisions of International law, incorporating therein the requirement of National Interest (with no advance hypothetical/Schemers planned danger expection) to the Nation's secuirity”. And to oblierate like the futre scope to incorporate any provisions like that of highly unethical (immoral)induction of changes made in the legal system by the then BUSH administration.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL is defenitely right to support the cause of “RULE OF LAW” and to and to be within the jurisdiction of international law. A country which does support the cause and of Rule of law, then it would be assumed its run by Jungle law. Yes kit was during BUSH and CHENEY era.

By: Video Bokep

Video Bokep — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:56:32 +0000

Useful for my job, this has made my life (my projects) goes a lot easier. Keep up the good work, thanks very much…

By: udslkf

udslkf — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:25:50 +0000

経済雑誌
ソフト開発
キャッシング

CloneDVD
ハワイアンジュエリー
初音ミク
川崎市　不動産

By: Bokep Indo

Bokep Indo — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:23:21 +0000

WHY IS OBAMA PROTECTING BUSH AND CHENEY?
They obviously violated Federal Law.

Lol… heheehe….

By: earlycsa

earlycsa — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:45:30 +0000

Daphne, You failed to mention who imprisoned those Japanese Americans. Only an oversight I suppose, since it was your great socialist leader FDR. And Eric Holder that paragon of virtue who knows how to pardon the chosen ones of the Clintonista regime. Only for the good ole' days of Bubba and stained dresses. No playing around now that you've got a “Real Progressive” as der leader,All Hail Obamanation! Too bad communism never works economically,but give it a try anyway,you've drunk too much cool aid to recover.

By: BokepGratis

BokepGratis — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:30:36 +0000

Mr. Holder you can either be a Patriot is the mold of John Adams, or you can be a slicker Albert Gonzales…. I agree…

By: Cerita Panas

Cerita Panas — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:47:21 +0000

Nice info… useful for me, thanks a lot sir….

By: Cerita Panas

Cerita Panas — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:47:21 +0000

Nice info… useful for me, thanks a lot sir….