People Are Afraid Cash-for-Clunkers Will Be Too Successful?

By
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 at 11:01 am

President Obama is pushing a compromise cash-for-clunkers program that will bridge the gap between two competing bills and provide a sliding incentives scale, whereby drivers will receive a cash voucher for trading in their old cars for more fuel-efficient ones — the greater the increase in efficiency, the more valuable the voucher.

Yet the plan has come under some criticism, the basic thrust of which appears to be that it might be too successful.

Some environmentalists have argued that by spurring new car production, it could actually lead to higher carbon emissions, rather than reducing emissions as intended, since 10 to 20 percent of a car’s lifetime emissions come from its manufacturing. Still, with Detroit on its knees and many thousands of Americans out of work, few would argue that stimulating the auto industry would be a bad thing, particularly if it’s producing more fuel-efficient vehicles. There may be merit to this line of reasoning, but it’ll never fly in Congress or with the public at large.

Other critics point to the example of Germany, where a similar cash-for-clunkers program was so popular (car sales rose 11.9 percent in February, as they fell just about everywhere else in the world) that it cost the government three times the anticipated price tag. Sure, Berlin might have to scrounge a bit to come up with the extra 3 billion euros (roughly $4 billion). But if we can turn around Detroit with just a few billion dollars, none but the fiercest deficit hawks will complain — particularly when we’ve already spent over $17 billion trying to do just that, and could end up shelling out as much as $130 billion.

Now, there are some legitimate causes for concern, such as the potential impact of cash-for-clunkers on used car dealerships. Still, with the auto industry in such perilous straits, it’s hard to turn down the prospect of a program that can simultaneously encourage fuel efficiency and improve the long-term health of Detroit.

Follow Aaron Wiener on Twitter


Comments

5 Comments

GPF
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 12:15 pm

In the case of a sliding scale, how will fuel economy be calculated for old cars? I have a 1995 Grand Marquis, and while it got 25 mpg highway when new, its tired engine with 218,000 miles on it prob gets no better than 15 mpg these days. But how would I prove that?


‘Cash For Clunkers’ To Benefit Fuel Efficient Car Adoption · Environmental Leader · Green Business, Sustainable Business, and Green Strategy News for Corporate Sustainability Executives
Pingback posted May 6, 2009 @ 9:56 am

[...] because 10-20 percent of a car’s lifetime emissions come during the manufacturing process, according to the Washington [...]


mjb7
Comment posted June 10, 2009 @ 8:49 am

Ditto to GPFs comment


mjb7
Comment posted June 10, 2009 @ 3:49 pm

Ditto to GPFs comment


car fuel saving devices
Trackback posted August 17, 2009 @ 11:01 pm

car fuel saving devices…

I have seen some crappy posts but this one really impresses me. Good work….


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.