<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gates $663 Billion Budget Changes Defense Priorities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:53:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: US military spending hit $607 billion in 2008</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-33734</link>
		<dc:creator>US military spending hit $607 billion in 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-33734</guid>
		<description>[...] the change of Administration has not reversed the trend. The Obama Administration has asked for $663 billion for the military for fiscal year 2010, including supplemental funding for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Although some wasteful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the change of Administration has not reversed the trend. The Obama Administration has asked for $663 billion for the military for fiscal year 2010, including supplemental funding for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Although some wasteful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding Government &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AT PENTAGON, THE SOFT BIGOTRY OF LOW EXPECTATIONS</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-26072</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AT PENTAGON, THE SOFT BIGOTRY OF LOW EXPECTATIONS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-26072</guid>
		<description>[...] percent, to $534 billion. That doesn&#8217;t include the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which wil bring the total to $663 billion. Headlines last week like &quot;Gates calls for huge cuts to defense programs&quot; and &quot;Gates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] percent, to $534 billion. That doesn&#8217;t include the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which wil bring the total to $663 billion. Headlines last week like &quot;Gates calls for huge cuts to defense programs&quot; and &quot;Gates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-34707</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-34707</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m tallying up the totals through FY 2010. This is the last year there&#039;ll be a supplemental. OMB gave out the $663 billion total when it gave the total budget number a couple weeks ago. $534 billion is indeed not inclusive of the costs of the wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m tallying up the totals through FY 2010. This is the last year there&#39;ll be a supplemental. OMB gave out the $663 billion total when it gave the total budget number a couple weeks ago. $534 billion is indeed not inclusive of the costs of the wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-25934</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-25934</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m tallying up the totals through FY 2010. This is the last year there&#039;ll be a supplemental. OMB gave out the $663 billion total when it gave the total budget number a couple weeks ago. $534 billion is indeed not inclusive of the costs of the wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m tallying up the totals through FY 2010. This is the last year there&#39;ll be a supplemental. OMB gave out the $663 billion total when it gave the total budget number a couple weeks ago. $534 billion is indeed not inclusive of the costs of the wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gates Reins In Bloated Defense Budget</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-25324</link>
		<dc:creator>Gates Reins In Bloated Defense Budget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-25324</guid>
		<description>[...] of Management and Budget, told the Washington Independent that Gates&#8217;s proposal was a &#8220;very important step&#8221; to &#8220;stop the era of irresponsibility, and no longer kick down the road tough decisions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Management and Budget, told the Washington Independent that Gates&#8217;s proposal was a &#8220;very important step&#8221; to &#8220;stop the era of irresponsibility, and no longer kick down the road tough decisions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best Defense - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-25253</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Defense - The Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-25253</guid>
		<description>[...] Spencer Ackerman at the Washington Independent:  The long-awaited fiscal 2010 budget request, which has a price tag of $534 billion and climbs to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spencer Ackerman at the Washington Independent:  The long-awaited fiscal 2010 budget request, which has a price tag of $534 billion and climbs to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobar</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-25212</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-25212</guid>
		<description>Can you elaborate on this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The long-awaited fiscal 2010 budget request, which has a price tag of $534 billion and climbs to $663.7 billion when the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are factored in.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought that the O admin was folling the Iraq/Afghan wars into the military budget. So isnt the cost of those 2 wars reflected in the 534 figure?  Or, the supplemental spending for 2010 has already occurred irrespective of the 2010 budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you elaborate on this?</p>
<p>&#8220;The long-awaited fiscal 2010 budget request, which has a price tag of $534 billion and climbs to $663.7 billion when the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are factored in.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought that the O admin was folling the Iraq/Afghan wars into the military budget. So isnt the cost of those 2 wars reflected in the 534 figure?  Or, the supplemental spending for 2010 has already occurred irrespective of the 2010 budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Yglesias &#187; Praise for the New Defense Budget</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-24877</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Yglesias &#187; Praise for the New Defense Budget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-24877</guid>
		<description>[...] more analysis on yesterday&#8217;s defense budget analysis see Robert Farley, Spencer Ackerman, Fred Kaplan, and James Fallows. All are impressed, and all rightly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more analysis on yesterday&#8217;s defense budget analysis see Robert Farley, Spencer Ackerman, Fred Kaplan, and James Fallows. All are impressed, and all rightly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Ackerman examines the Gates budget &#171; Later On</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37503/gates-663-billion-budget-changes-defense-priorities/comment-page-1#comment-24722</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman examines the Gates budget &#171; Later On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37503#comment-24722</guid>
		<description>[...] in Democrats, Military, Obama administration at 4:34 pm by LeisureGuy Well worth reading. It begins: Defense Secretary Gates took a major step toward rebalancing U.S. defense priorities on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Democrats, Military, Obama administration at 4:34 pm by LeisureGuy Well worth reading. It begins: Defense Secretary Gates took a major step toward rebalancing U.S. defense priorities on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
