<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defense Department Threatens Gitmo Lawyer With Jail for Writing to President Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/37412/defense-department-threatens-gitmo-lawyer-with-jail-for-writing-to-president-obama/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37412/defense-department-threatens-gitmo-lawyer-with-jail-for-writing-to-president-obama</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37412/defense-department-threatens-gitmo-lawyer-with-jail-for-writing-to-president-obama/comment-page-1#comment-36136</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37412#comment-36136</guid>
		<description>quote:  &quot;Judge Thomas Hogan has ordered Smith and his colleague Ahmed Ghappour to appear in his court on May 11 and explain why they should not be held in contempt of court. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is Judge Thomas Hogan&#039;s bias, if any?  Is this a predictable ruling for him?  Some pretty bizarre and unbelievable things are taking place in this country and, sometimes, as Obama has said (quoting Lincoln, perhaps), &quot;there are things that only a union can do.&quot;  There are too many secrets in government, in my opinion.  Should a &quot;privilege review team&quot; from DOD wield so much power that the end result is something like this?    A small select group should not be controlling the flow of information and, in effect, preventing the president from having rightful access to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The president has a right to see the evidence, in my opinion.  And it would seem, on the face of it, that Mr. Smith  (and Ahmend Ghappour) did the right thing by bringing this information to the one person who might be in a position to actually do something with it.  Oft repeated, but I&#039;ll say it again (quoting Judge Louis Brandeis):  &quot;Sunlight is the best disinfectant.&quot;  Why is the free-flow of information so objectionable to some?  And to what end?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote:  &#8220;Judge Thomas Hogan has ordered Smith and his colleague Ahmed Ghappour to appear in his court on May 11 and explain why they should not be held in contempt of court. &#8220;</p>
<p>What is Judge Thomas Hogan&#39;s bias, if any?  Is this a predictable ruling for him?  Some pretty bizarre and unbelievable things are taking place in this country and, sometimes, as Obama has said (quoting Lincoln, perhaps), &#8220;there are things that only a union can do.&#8221;  There are too many secrets in government, in my opinion.  Should a &#8220;privilege review team&#8221; from DOD wield so much power that the end result is something like this?    A small select group should not be controlling the flow of information and, in effect, preventing the president from having rightful access to it.</p>
<p>The president has a right to see the evidence, in my opinion.  And it would seem, on the face of it, that Mr. Smith  (and Ahmend Ghappour) did the right thing by bringing this information to the one person who might be in a position to actually do something with it.  Oft repeated, but I&#39;ll say it again (quoting Judge Louis Brandeis):  &#8220;Sunlight is the best disinfectant.&#8221;  Why is the free-flow of information so objectionable to some?  And to what end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37412/defense-department-threatens-gitmo-lawyer-with-jail-for-writing-to-president-obama/comment-page-1#comment-24935</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37412#comment-24935</guid>
		<description>quote:  &quot;Judge Thomas Hogan has ordered Smith and his colleague Ahmed Ghappour to appear in his court on May 11 and explain why they should not be held in contempt of court. &quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is Judge Thomas Hogan&#039;s bias, if any?  Is this a predictable ruling for him?  Some pretty bizarre and unbelievable things are taking place in this country and, sometimes, as Obama has said (quoting Lincoln, perhaps), &quot;there are things that only a union can do.&quot;  There are too many secrets in government, in my opinion.  Should a &quot;privilege review team&quot; from DOD wield so much power that the end result is something like this?    A small select group should not be controlling the flow of information and, in effect, preventing the president from having rightful access to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The president has a right to see the evidence, in my opinion.  And it would seem, on the face of it, that Mr. Smith  (and Ahmend Ghappour) did the right thing by bringing this information to the one person who might be in a position to actually do something with it.  Oft repeated, but I&#039;ll say it again (quoting Judge Louis Brandeis):  &quot;Sunlight is the best disinfectant.&quot;  Why is the free-flow of information so objectionable to some?  And to what end?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote:  &#8220;Judge Thomas Hogan has ordered Smith and his colleague Ahmed Ghappour to appear in his court on May 11 and explain why they should not be held in contempt of court. &#8220;</p>
<p>What is Judge Thomas Hogan&#39;s bias, if any?  Is this a predictable ruling for him?  Some pretty bizarre and unbelievable things are taking place in this country and, sometimes, as Obama has said (quoting Lincoln, perhaps), &#8220;there are things that only a union can do.&#8221;  There are too many secrets in government, in my opinion.  Should a &#8220;privilege review team&#8221; from DOD wield so much power that the end result is something like this?    A small select group should not be controlling the flow of information and, in effect, preventing the president from having rightful access to it.</p>
<p>The president has a right to see the evidence, in my opinion.  And it would seem, on the face of it, that Mr. Smith  (and Ahmend Ghappour) did the right thing by bringing this information to the one person who might be in a position to actually do something with it.  Oft repeated, but I&#39;ll say it again (quoting Judge Louis Brandeis):  &#8220;Sunlight is the best disinfectant.&#8221;  Why is the free-flow of information so objectionable to some?  And to what end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defense Dept threatens Gitmo lawyer with jail &#171; Later On</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37412/defense-department-threatens-gitmo-lawyer-with-jail-for-writing-to-president-obama/comment-page-1#comment-24628</link>
		<dc:creator>Defense Dept threatens Gitmo lawyer with jail &#171; Later On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37412#comment-24628</guid>
		<description>[...] in Daily life, Democrats, Government, Military, Obama administration at 12:34 pm by LeisureGuy Daphne Eviatar in the Washington Independent: This story, which was reported in The Guardian and confirmed by publicly filed court documents, is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Daily life, Democrats, Government, Military, Obama administration at 12:34 pm by LeisureGuy Daphne Eviatar in the Washington Independent: This story, which was reported in The Guardian and confirmed by publicly filed court documents, is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

