Comments on: Ironically, Palin Opposes Sex-Ed

By: sex toys

sex toys — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:29:39 +0000

great post thanks!

By: Andrew

Andrew — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:10:42 +0000

This does not surprise me. I had read that Sarah Palin was also pregnant and had to get married or elected to get married. So Sarah is not a good example of no sex education. she could have used those classes… and rape being the biggest problem in Alaska

By: Steve

Steve — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:13:28 +0000

The link on Eagle Forum Alaska has been replaced/re-routed to John McCain's website. Hmmm

By: Peggy2

Peggy2 — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:51:21 +0000

Hang on to your hat, Mich, cause our pageant contestant is better looking and has more executive experience than your pageant contestant. Shits for you is your beauty queen is running for President.

By: Peggy2

Peggy2 — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:49:18 +0000

You're a first-class prick, David.

By: Mich

Mich — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:12:25 +0000

It's oh, so very clear, Ms. Palin has some issues.
I'm sure John boy will be wishing for Joey as his VP selection before all the facts come out about our pageant contestant.

By: David

David — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:48:54 +0000

There is nothing ironic about Palin's opposition to sex ed. Her daughter's pregnancy was by immaculate conception.

By: Howie Kurtznot

Howie Kurtznot — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:30:54 +0000

Here's Eagle Forum question #11, which suggests that the Governor does not know much about history (maybe it's a home-schooling thing):

11. Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.

[The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892. "Under God" was added in 1954.]