Comments on: Palin’s Unmarried Daughter Pregnant

By: Mich

Mich — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:05:43 +0000

Hummmm,
If it is true, and of course it is possible. The republicans should evaluate their stance on "personal issues". Take note of quote below. It may come back to bite them.

“The smearing of the Palin family must end. The allegations contained on the cover of the National Enquirer insinuating that Gov. Palin had an extramarital affair are categorically false. It is a vicious lie,” said McCain senior adviser Steve Schmidt.

I switched affiliations when the Republicans made it their business to make bedroom issues part of their political agenda. When will they learn.
The worm has turned.

Stay out of my Bedroom, I'll stay out of yours!

By: Mich

Mich — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:05:43 +0000

By: ao

ao — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:32:52 +0000

Nobody seems to consider the possibility that she may have tried to “kill” the 5th child by acting so unbelievably carelessly after her water broke – if it was her child that is.

By: Ervin Sowell

Ervin Sowell — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:27:23 +0000

Sarah Palin's mysteriously reckless behavior in the 24 plus hours before Trig's birth still asks some very curious questions. While in Texas did Sarah Palin receive a call that Bristol was in labor? That would explain why there was no rush to get medical attention. Why were no records of a Palin birth at Mat Su clinic. found for april 18th? Does Trig really have Down Syndrome or is that just a red herring to make the 44 yr. old Sarah more likely to be the mother? What an opportunity for a miracle cure through prayer later! Is Bristol really pregnant now? Sarah Palin has lied about her support for the “Bridge to Nowhere” before it became an embarrassment. She has lied about her abuse of power concerning Troopergate. Those two points are enough to base a decision on. We could just leave Bristol and Trig out of it.

By: Homedespot

Homedespot — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:41:37 +0000

There are many ways the McCain/Palin campaign could stop the rumors about Trig Palin's parentage. Yet, to my knowledge they haven't issued a denial of the story. In today's Washington Post, campaign officials complain about the press' treatment of Palin and her family. Concrete evidence that the baby is Sarah's would reinforce their criticism of the coverage they have received. Given the benefits to them and the ease of demonstrating Trig's parentage — they wouldn't have to go so far as to release medical records, the obstetrician's word would likely suffice — the fact that they haven't responded to the rumors is itself suspicious

By: stan brinton

stan brinton — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:45:04 +0000

How old is the father? Can his age be verified? Was she underage and he an adult when they had sex together?
Were their hospital pictures when Sarah had Trigg?

By: Mich

Mich — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:12:35 +0000

looks like her daughter to me!
But, hey.. who really cares about her daughter getting knocked up? The real issue is the old duesch Bag McCain didn't do his homework…

Oh, to be sure, there is more than just a little bastard that will be revealed

By: eWriter

eWriter — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:05:30 +0000

The rumors of Sarah Palin's deception regarding Trig's birth may be true. Of course, 100% proof is needed before this issue is discussed again.

News to check/verify: in the video below at about 1:30 Does Bristol Palin appear briefly in this video as pregnant (and chubby) in early 2008? A birth by Bristol in April and her being pregnant now are both possible within the vague 4-5 month timeline. This video should be researched to determine the identity of the pregnant woman walking arm-in-arm with Sarah Palin. . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXfiOSCfY44

Thanks for looking into this.

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:54:34 +0000

“When she gave birth to her fifth child with Down syndrome…”

So does that mean that Palin has five children with Down syndrome – or that the fifth child was afflicted with Down syndrome?

By: Gombo

Gombo — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:35:14 +0000

Dave,
You said “It is physiologically impossible for the 17 yr old to have a 4 month baby, and be 5 months pregnant.” The question we should be asking ourselves is :is this child really pregnant now? Or is this made up to cover the true story?