Comments on: Why Is Holder Not Re-Trying Ted Stevens?

By: 3053488

3053488 — Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:40:14 +0000

3053488 beers on the wall. sck was here

By: ted

ted — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:23:47 +0000

Someone either got a huge payoff, financial, political or otherwise, or someone has gotten into the blackmail. Journalists need to investigate, assuming they're not pursuing more important things like what color Taylor Swift's new panties happen to be.

By: Clarice

Clarice — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:35:46 +0000

Because they have no case and because it will only allow the defense to make perfectly plain that the Department's prosecutors were lying, cheating, partisans who railroaded an innocent man.

By: ted

ted — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:23:47 +0000

By: Clarice

Clarice — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:35:46 +0000

Because they have no case and because it will only allow the defense to make perfectly plain that the Department's prosecutors were lying, cheating, partisans who railroaded an innocent man.

By: Stevens Case Dropped Following Tainted Guilty Finding | The Ruth Group

Stevens Case Dropped Following Tainted Guilty Finding | The Ruth Group — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:52:04 +0000

[...] at least a few are wondering why there will be no new trial. After all the original evidence is there. New prosecutors, obviously with the wind in their faces, [...]