<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neocons for Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a knight</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/comment-page-1#comment-37009</link>
		<dc:creator>a knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=36467#comment-37009</guid>
		<description>This is hardly strong evidence of &quot;Neocons For Obama&quot;, and is much more indicative of classic Neoconservative behavior: scurrying away from accepting responsibility for their own past actions. Where were the Neconservatives back in December 2001 through 2002 on the issue of War in Afghanistan? They were downplaying the significance of pressing after America&#039;s true enemy, pretending that Tora Bora had not been a massive failure, and that important elements of al Qaida&#039;s leadership had not escaped into the Pakistan frontier. They were successfully fomenting a war against Iraq on false premises, and engaging in the war is the reason that al Qaida was able to lick its wounds and metastasize. Let me know when Kristol steps up and accepts responsibility for this. Until then, it is best to remember that Billy Crystal is a comedian, but Billy Kristol is an evil clown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hardly strong evidence of &#8220;Neocons For Obama&#8221;, and is much more indicative of classic Neoconservative behavior: scurrying away from accepting responsibility for their own past actions. Where were the Neconservatives back in December 2001 through 2002 on the issue of War in Afghanistan? They were downplaying the significance of pressing after America&#39;s true enemy, pretending that Tora Bora had not been a massive failure, and that important elements of al Qaida&#39;s leadership had not escaped into the Pakistan frontier. They were successfully fomenting a war against Iraq on false premises, and engaging in the war is the reason that al Qaida was able to lick its wounds and metastasize. Let me know when Kristol steps up and accepts responsibility for this. Until then, it is best to remember that Billy Crystal is a comedian, but Billy Kristol is an evil clown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a knight</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/comment-page-1#comment-24150</link>
		<dc:creator>a knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=36467#comment-24150</guid>
		<description>This is hardly strong evidence of &quot;Neocons For Obama&quot;, and is much more indicative of classic Neoconservative behavior: scurrying away from accepting responsibility for their own past actions. Where were the Neconservatives back in December 2001 through 2002 on the issue of War in Afghanistan? They were downplaying the significance of pressing after America&#039;s true enemy, pretending that Tora Bora had not been a massive failure, and that important elements of al Qaida&#039;s leadership had not escaped into the Pakistan frontier. They were successfully fomenting a war against Iraq on false premises, and engaging in the war is the reason that al Qaida was able to lick its wounds and metastasize. Let me know when Kristol steps up and accepts responsibility for this. Until then, it is best to remember that Billy Crystal is a comedian, but Billy Kristol is an evil clown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hardly strong evidence of &#8220;Neocons For Obama&#8221;, and is much more indicative of classic Neoconservative behavior: scurrying away from accepting responsibility for their own past actions. Where were the Neconservatives back in December 2001 through 2002 on the issue of War in Afghanistan? They were downplaying the significance of pressing after America&#39;s true enemy, pretending that Tora Bora had not been a massive failure, and that important elements of al Qaida&#39;s leadership had not escaped into the Pakistan frontier. They were successfully fomenting a war against Iraq on false premises, and engaging in the war is the reason that al Qaida was able to lick its wounds and metastasize. Let me know when Kristol steps up and accepts responsibility for this. Until then, it is best to remember that Billy Crystal is a comedian, but Billy Kristol is an evil clown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All hail Obama! &#171; Wizreport</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/comment-page-1#comment-23978</link>
		<dc:creator>All hail Obama! &#171; Wizreport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=36467#comment-23978</guid>
		<description>[...] Kagan on Obama&#8217;s Afghan plan: “He’s definitely saying no to pulling back,” said Fred Kagan, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kagan on Obama&#8217;s Afghan plan: “He’s definitely saying no to pulling back,” said Fred Kagan, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Mynack</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/comment-page-1#comment-23985</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Mynack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=36467#comment-23985</guid>
		<description>Given that the Neocons (at least the foreign policy ones) mostly have their origins in working with the likes of  Daniel Patrick  Moyhihan and Scoop Jackson, this is hardly surprising. They are at heart extreme pro-Israeli interventionists and it really doesn&#039;t matter who is in power, as long as it suits their ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that the Neocons (at least the foreign policy ones) mostly have their origins in working with the likes of  Daniel Patrick  Moyhihan and Scoop Jackson, this is hardly surprising. They are at heart extreme pro-Israeli interventionists and it really doesn&#39;t matter who is in power, as long as it suits their ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clearing my tabs &#171; Around Teh Table</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/comment-page-1#comment-23944</link>
		<dc:creator>Clearing my tabs &#171; Around Teh Table</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=36467#comment-23944</guid>
		<description>[...] have survived the purges of the last few years are supportive of Barack Obama&#8217;s policies in Afghanistan and in regard to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have survived the purges of the last few years are supportive of Barack Obama&#8217;s policies in Afghanistan and in regard to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/comment-page-1#comment-23922</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=36467#comment-23922</guid>
		<description>I think that there are still a lot of challenges, and you can expect that it will not always be easy and that he will have to make many tough and unpopular decisions.  People might enjoy this list of the top ten signs the president’s gig is harder than you thought: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.toptentopten.com/topten/signs+president+gig+is+harder+than+you+thought&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.toptentopten.com/topten/signs+presid...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there are still a lot of challenges, and you can expect that it will not always be easy and that he will have to make many tough and unpopular decisions.  People might enjoy this list of the top ten signs the president’s gig is harder than you thought: <a href="http://www.toptentopten.com/topten/signs+president+gig+is+harder+than+you+thought" rel="nofollow">http://www.toptentopten.com/topten/signs+presid&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abg</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/36467/neocons-for-obama/comment-page-1#comment-23921</link>
		<dc:creator>abg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=36467#comment-23921</guid>
		<description>Are you sure this wasn&#039;t Robert Kagan, not Fred, who made this remark?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure this wasn&#39;t Robert Kagan, not Fred, who made this remark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

