Flournoy: It’s a COIN Strategy for a Counterterrorism Goal
Friday, March 27, 2009 at 4:22 pm
I’ve been writing for weeks now that President Obama’s approach to Af-Pak is a counterinsurgency strategy to meet a counterterrorism objective. And — just saying! — Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy described the approach exactly like that during her press briefing today:
What we’re doing is stepping up to more fully resource a counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan that is designed to first reverse Taliban gains and secure the population, particularly in the most contested areas of the south and east; second, provide the Afghan national security forces with the training and the mentoring they need to expand rapidly and to take — ultimately take the lead in providing security for their nation; and finally, to provide a secure environment that will enable governance and development efforts to take root and grow.
So this is a — it has as its goal disrupting and defeating al Qaeda and its associates, and preventing Afghanistan and Pakistan — preventing Afghanistan from returning to become a safe haven. But it is very much a counterinsurgency approach towards that end.
So please, no more about this false distinction between Obama’s counterterrorism choice and his counterinsurgency choice.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
5 Comments
Pingback posted May 18, 2009 @ 12:26 am
[...] be out of power, but their dream of a regional transformation in the Middle East lives on in the CNAS-Petraeus COIN strategy, whose advocates boast of their ability to effect change on whole societies. [...]
Pingback posted September 4, 2009 @ 3:45 am
[...] Creep Watch.” Even so, administration officials, who for months have described taking a counterinsurgency-based approach to a counterterrorism objective, have argued privately that they see little choice but to pursue a strategy that places providing [...]
Pingback posted September 21, 2009 @ 9:22 am
[...] can’t be faulted for presuming that Obama’s commitment in March to a counterinsurgency campaign for a counterterrorism goal meant he should interpret counterinsurgency as broadly as he could or pursue it as aggressively as [...]
Pingback posted September 21, 2009 @ 5:55 pm
[...] of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy, one of the foremost counterinsurgency advocates in the Obama administration, gave a similar just-one-consideration-of-many statement to [...]
Pingback posted September 21, 2009 @ 7:27 pm
[...] of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy, one of the foremost counterinsurgency advocates in the Obama administration, gave a similar just-one-consideration-of-many statement to [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss