Comments on: Rep. Bill Posey Explains His Birther Bill

By: 2729294

2729294 — Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:51:50 +0000

2729294 beers on the wall. sck was here

By: 4194599

4194599 — Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:51:48 +0000

4194599 beers on the wall. sck was here

By: Privacy Manager

Privacy Manager — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:36:00 +0000

Sorry, I meant to type, “the only proof of birth provided by the state of Hawaii.”

By: Privacy Manager

Privacy Manager — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:52:00 +0000

You respond with the usual birther misdirection. She was in a position to have her candidate win. Instead she is bought off and uses cryptic language to send the true believers a hidden message.

There is nothing but a string of what-ifs, provenly forged documents from convicted forgers, and supposition.

By: Privacy Manager

Privacy Manager — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:52:00 +0000

You respond with the usual birther misdirection. She was in a position to have her candidate win. Instead she is bought off and uses cryptic language to send the true believers a hidden message.

There is nothing but a string of what-ifs, provenly forged documents from convicted forgers, and supposition.

By: Privacy Manager

Privacy Manager — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:49:00 +0000

Where did you read that and how does it apply? Please don’t give me that Vattell Law of Nations nonsense. That title was not given to the book until after the Constitution was written, nor was he a significant expert on national law.

There have been only two SCOTUS cases of which I am aware. The first was Dred Scott, which was overturned by Wong Kim Arc.

How do explain Chester Arthur and Spiro Agnew?

By: Privacy Manager

Privacy Manager — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:49:00 +0000

There have been only two SCOTUS cases of which I am aware. The first was Dred Scott, which was overturned by Wong Kim Arc.

How do explain Chester Arthur and Spiro Agnew?

By: Privacy Manager

Privacy Manager — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:44:00 +0000

I have. Provide the cite to demonstrate that your definition of natural born citizen is accurate. I have provided one that says it is not.

Your example is only partially correct. If a child is born in the, the child is a natural born citizen and able to run for President upon achieving the age of 35 and having been a resident of the country for fourteen years.

By: Paul Wade

Paul Wade — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:57:00 +0000

You are right. The 14th Amendment is legal. But I suggest you read the entire Constitution!

By: Paul Wade

Paul Wade — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:54:00 +0000

Basically, Amendment XIV simply states all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof…

If that, then, bi-passes Article II, Section !, Paragraph 5 in its requirement for the President to only be s ‘simple’ citizen, then wouldn’t it have to accepted for any illegal alien to come into the United States and have a baby, that is being given automatic citizenship and it would automatically be eligible to become president of our nation? Even if the child had been taken back across the border to their homeland, and simply came back just in time to run for the presiend’s office?
,