rssJindal on Failure
Wednesday, March 25, 2009 at 12:49 pm
- 9 Comments
I attended the first half of last night’s National Republican Congressional Committee dinner in Washington, bolting (with about half the press corps) after Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal gave a mulligan speech addressing how the party should oppose the president. Phil Klein nails the feeling in the room.
While the crowd reacted positively, their applause was much more tepid than I would have expected given that he’s still considered one of the rising stars in the party. Public speaking, as far as I can tell, is not one of his political strengths.
Jindal’s goals were to 1) do better than his Obama response speech and to 2) engage with the press and the base on the question of whether Republicans really wanted the president to “fail.” Jindal called this “political correctness run amok” and argued that Republicans only want the president to fail if his agenda is hurting the country. But this part rang hollow:
The very Democrat leaders who are now asking this phony question, are the ones who for so long wanted to see the last President fail, regardless of the issue, and regardless of whether he was right or wrong.
This is Limbaughism, and it’s both partially untrue and rhetorically tricky. At the start of George W. Bush’s presidency, he won major Democratic support for two of his big initiatives—Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) on tax cuts, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) on education. After Sept.11, of course, Democrats fell completely in line with Bush on the war on terror, giving him honeymoon political support that lasted for months. At the end of Bush’s presidency, it was Democratic votes (including that of then-Sen. Barack Obama) that passed the Wall Street bailout — not the action of a party that wanted the president to fail, even as they blamed his party for the crisis.
The “regardless of whether he was right or wrong” bit of this is, of course, nonsense — can any Republican name an instance of Democrats opposing Bush when they thought he was right? They’d probably cite some Iraq War votes, but it’s re-writing history to say that Democrats opposed the war, or the funding, or the surge, out of hope that Bush would fail. The Democrats who voted “no” on the war didn’t think it would work. They opposed former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld because he was a failure, and opposed the surge because they thought it would fail. In retrospect they were right on the former and wrong on the latter. But it’s a stretch to accuse them of acting in bad faith. They believed what Jindal now says Republicans believe: “That they are completely wrong, and that their path will have dire consequences for not only this time, but also for the future of America.”
The Jindal speech (text here) was the latest step in the evolution of a rather interesting political figure into one who knows what he must say, true or untrue, to win over the national GOP base.
–
You can engage with TWI on Twitter. Follow us here.
Follow David Weigel on Twitter
9 Comments
Comment posted March 25, 2009 @ 10:44 am
As a conservative Republican I do NOT want the President to fail – that wish is tantamount to treason in front of the watching world out there. I am an American first! We had 8 years to get it right and we managed to take a tidy amount unspent by Clinton and run it up into trillions in debt. Due to perhaps deliberate lack of oversight, our financial institutions crashed in a greedy feeding frenzy tanking our housing and auto industries. It will take years to get out of this hole and if a Democrat can do it, I salute him. All this happened on our watch so we need to stand up and take our lumps. And I have yet to hear any workable solutions for this crisis from the Republican spokesmen. This Jindal and Limbaugh and Gingrich can take their mewling and tell it to the people in Iceland, an ancient democracy, whose banks have crashed because of us – tell it to the Irish, the Celtic Tiger is now one wet sputtering cat because of us. We may have lost the few friends we had left in the world, and I can't blame them!
Comment posted March 25, 2009 @ 11:04 am
I can say that I beleive 99.9% of the Democrats did not want Bush and his administration to fail. We supported the president and his cohorts, even though they turned out to be a failures and a criminals. Replicans trash talking this president and wanting him to fail is tantamount to treason and they should be arrested and put in jail.
Comment posted March 25, 2009 @ 12:53 pm
It's easy to want failure for the President, but the had stuff, is using your intelligence, and creativity to come up with something that is successful in opposition to what's being presented. The other word was creative, meaning not the same old tired ideas from the last Administration. Leadership is not about wanting failure, no matter what Country you're from, it's about using your smarts, resources, and creative mind to make something work for the people of your Country. Just by defending the “failure” policy, tells you this man has nothing to give as a solution, but is great at destruction. Amazing….
Comment posted March 25, 2009 @ 5:44 pm
As a conservative Republican I do NOT want the President to fail – that wish is tantamount to treason in front of the watching world out there. I am an American first! We had 8 years to get it right and we managed to take a tidy amount unspent by Clinton and run it up into trillions in debt. Due to perhaps deliberate lack of oversight, our financial institutions crashed in a greedy feeding frenzy tanking our housing and auto industries. It will take years to get out of this hole and if a Democrat can do it, I salute him. All this happened on our watch so we need to stand up and take our lumps. And I have yet to hear any workable solutions for this crisis from the Republican spokesmen. This Jindal and Limbaugh and Gingrich can take their mewling and tell it to the people in Iceland, an ancient democracy, whose banks have crashed because of us – tell it to the Irish, the Celtic Tiger is now one wet sputtering cat because of us. We may have lost the few friends we had left in the world, and I can't blame them!
Comment posted March 25, 2009 @ 6:04 pm
I can say that I beleive 99.9% of the Democrats did not want Bush and his administration to fail. We supported the president and his cohorts, even though they turned out to be a failures and a criminals. Replicans trash talking this president and wanting him to fail is tantamount to treason and they should be arrested and put in jail.
Comment posted March 25, 2009 @ 7:53 pm
It's easy to want failure for the President, but the had stuff, is using your intelligence, and creativity to come up with something that is successful in opposition to what's being presented. The other word was creative, meaning not the same old tired ideas from the last Administration. Leadership is not about wanting failure, no matter what Country you're from, it's about using your smarts, resources, and creative mind to make something work for the people of your Country. Just by defending the “failure” policy, tells you this man has nothing to give as a solution, but is great at destruction. Amazing….
Trackback posted March 27, 2009 @ 3:37 am
Buy Propecia…
http://www.folkd.com/user/buypropeciaonline Buy Propecia…
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
