<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norquist: Specter to Oppose Cloture on EFCA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi Medium &#187; Deja Vu Epic Fail</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-143859</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi Medium &#187; Deja Vu Epic Fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-143859</guid>
		<description>[...] I mean no one saw it coming. The first person to hear about Specter’s newfound opposition was freaking Grover Norquist, who announced the news to a roomful of conservatives one morning. Grover knew before union leaders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mean no one saw it coming. The first person to hear about Specter’s newfound opposition was freaking Grover Norquist, who announced the news to a roomful of conservatives one morning. Grover knew before union leaders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pennsylvania Unions Endorse Specter, the Man Who Killed the Employee Free Choice Act &#124; NEWS Gate</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-143631</link>
		<dc:creator>Pennsylvania Unions Endorse Specter, the Man Who Killed the Employee Free Choice Act &#124; NEWS Gate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-143631</guid>
		<description>[...] I mean no one saw it coming. The first person to hear about Specter&#8217;s newfound opposition was freaking Grover Norquist, who announced the news to a roomful of conservatives one morning. Grover knew before union leaders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mean no one saw it coming. The first person to hear about Specter&#8217;s newfound opposition was freaking Grover Norquist, who announced the news to a roomful of conservatives one morning. Grover knew before union leaders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightOnline Attendees Groan at Specter EFCA Switch &#124; The Lie Politic</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-64989</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOnline Attendees Groan at Specter EFCA Switch &#124; The Lie Politic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-64989</guid>
		<description>[...] EFCA vote faded, are blasting out links to Specter&#8217;s previous stances on the issue. In March, TWI broke the news that Specter would filibuster card [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EFCA vote faded, are blasting out links to Specter&#8217;s previous stances on the issue. In March, TWI broke the news that Specter would filibuster card [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Propecia Online</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-23405</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Propecia Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-23405</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy Propecia Online...&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.folkd.com/user/buypropeciaonline Buy Propecia Online...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy Propecia Online&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.folkd.com/user/buypropeciaonline" rel="nofollow">http://www.folkd.com/user/buypropeciaonline</a> Buy Propecia Online&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eyes on the Ties &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social fabric stretched thin</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-23393</link>
		<dc:creator>Eyes on the Ties &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social fabric stretched thin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-23393</guid>
		<description>[...] Specter to oppose EFCA. (Washington Independent) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Specter to oppose EFCA. (Washington Independent) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-36476</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-36476</guid>
		<description>People want to make it sound like Specter&#039;s move deals a death blow to EFCA, and there is no question that it will be tough for Democrats to find the 60th vote. But there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/03/24/specter-no-to-efca/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;four Republicans who are said to be open to some type of compromise&lt;/a&gt;, first of which is Lika Murkowski, who said as much last month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People want to make it sound like Specter&#39;s move deals a death blow to EFCA, and there is no question that it will be tough for Democrats to find the 60th vote. But there are <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/03/24/specter-no-to-efca/" rel="nofollow">four Republicans who are said to be open to some type of compromise</a>, first of which is Lika Murkowski, who said as much last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-36478</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-36478</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Charlie...but you obviously have only gotten your information from a few sources. However, the NLRB offers substantive numbers on this subject. 94% of all union elections happen within 42-46 days after the union files with the NLRB for that election. Those that go longer are often at the request of the unions, who file &quot;blocking&quot; charges. Last year, unions WON 68% of these elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Charlie&#8230;but you obviously have only gotten your information from a few sources. However, the NLRB offers substantive numbers on this subject. 94% of all union elections happen within 42-46 days after the union files with the NLRB for that election. Those that go longer are often at the request of the unions, who file &#8220;blocking&#8221; charges. Last year, unions WON 68% of these elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-36477</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-36477</guid>
		<description>The people who have already left comments on this issue obviously know nothing about the real world when it comes to workers trying to obtain representation by A Union.  The present so-called &quot;secret ballot&quot; process under the National Labor relations Board has been so distorted by years of Republican appointed Board members, that it is no longer a viable way to obtain collective bargaining rights.  It can take literally years of litigation under the present system for workers who want representation to even come close to an election.  If an employer hires one of the many law firms who specialize in the process, the Board is so slanted toward employer wishes that the system can be played for years.&lt;br&gt;Forget about the overused argument about Unions being in it for the money they get from dues.  It  no longer makes economic or practical sense to try to organize workers under this process.  The system is slanted to such an extent that it does, in fact, make sense for an employer to pay for one of these firms to represent them, because the NLRB process can help them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who have already left comments on this issue obviously know nothing about the real world when it comes to workers trying to obtain representation by A Union.  The present so-called &#8220;secret ballot&#8221; process under the National Labor relations Board has been so distorted by years of Republican appointed Board members, that it is no longer a viable way to obtain collective bargaining rights.  It can take literally years of litigation under the present system for workers who want representation to even come close to an election.  If an employer hires one of the many law firms who specialize in the process, the Board is so slanted toward employer wishes that the system can be played for years.<br />Forget about the overused argument about Unions being in it for the money they get from dues.  It  no longer makes economic or practical sense to try to organize workers under this process.  The system is slanted to such an extent that it does, in fact, make sense for an employer to pay for one of these firms to represent them, because the NLRB process can help them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-23357</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-23357</guid>
		<description>People want to make it sound like Specter&#039;s move deals a death blow to EFCA, and there is no question that it will be tough for Democrats to find the 60th vote. But there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/03/24/specter-no-to-efca/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;four Republicans who are said to be open to some type of compromise&lt;/a&gt;, first of which is Lika Murkowski, who said as much last month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People want to make it sound like Specter&#39;s move deals a death blow to EFCA, and there is no question that it will be tough for Democrats to find the 60th vote. But there are <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2009/03/24/specter-no-to-efca/" rel="nofollow">four Republicans who are said to be open to some type of compromise</a>, first of which is Lika Murkowski, who said as much last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35470/norquist-specter-to-oppose-cloture-on-efca/comment-page-1#comment-23338</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35470#comment-23338</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Charlie...but you obviously have only gotten your information from a few sources. However, the NLRB offers substantive numbers on this subject. 94% of all union elections happen within 42-46 days after the union files with the NLRB for that election. Those that go longer are often at the request of the unions, who file &quot;blocking&quot; charges. Last year, unions WON 68% of these elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Charlie&#8230;but you obviously have only gotten your information from a few sources. However, the NLRB offers substantive numbers on this subject. 94% of all union elections happen within 42-46 days after the union files with the NLRB for that election. Those that go longer are often at the request of the unions, who file &#8220;blocking&#8221; charges. Last year, unions WON 68% of these elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

