<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT Wakes Up To Obama&#8217;s Surprising Flexibility on the Rule of Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; 100 days: What Obama does not want you to read</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-49952</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; 100 days: What Obama does not want you to read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-49952</guid>
		<description>[...] has broken or is breaking.  Many of those broken promises are just fine with the Right &#8212; Obama has adopted the Bush adminsitration&#8217;s positions on lawsuits over &#8220;torture,&#8221; warrantless wiretapping, state secrets and policies the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has broken or is breaking.  Many of those broken promises are just fine with the Right &#8212; Obama has adopted the Bush adminsitration&#8217;s positions on lawsuits over &#8220;torture,&#8221; warrantless wiretapping, state secrets and policies the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; The &#8220;reality-based community&#8221; meets reality</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-49947</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; The &#8220;reality-based community&#8221; meets reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-49947</guid>
		<description>[...] the TARP money, regardless of financial health).  And indignation from the more honest proggs over Obama’s actual record on controversial war issues and his apparent &#8220;all in&#8221; approach on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the TARP money, regardless of financial health).  And indignation from the more honest proggs over Obama’s actual record on controversial war issues and his apparent &#8220;all in&#8221; approach on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Andrew Sullivan: LEAVE OBAMA ALONE!!!</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-49945</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Andrew Sullivan: LEAVE OBAMA ALONE!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-49945</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama in the first place, but it apparently does not matter now.   Sullivan also ignores Obama&#8217;s actual record on war issues: [H]is Justice Department has been quietly pressing forward with some of the more controversial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama in the first place, but it apparently does not matter now.   Sullivan also ignores Obama&#8217;s actual record on war issues: [H]is Justice Department has been quietly pressing forward with some of the more controversial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100 days: What Obama Does Not Want You To Read &#171; Romanticpoet&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-30201</link>
		<dc:creator>100 days: What Obama Does Not Want You To Read &#171; Romanticpoet&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-30201</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama has broken or is breaking.  Many of those broken promises are just fine with the Right — Obama has adopted the Bush adminsitration’s positions on lawsuits over “torture,” warrantless wiretapping, state secrets and policies the powers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama has broken or is breaking.  Many of those broken promises are just fine with the Right — Obama has adopted the Bush adminsitration’s positions on lawsuits over “torture,” warrantless wiretapping, state secrets and policies the powers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; 100 days: What Obama does not want you to read</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-28744</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; Forum Archive &#187; 100 days: What Obama does not want you to read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-28744</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama has broken or is breaking. Many of those broken promises are just fine with the Right &#8212; Obama has adopted the Bush adminsitration&#8217;s positions on lawsuits over &#8220;torture,&#8221; warrantless wiretapping, state secrets and policies the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama has broken or is breaking. Many of those broken promises are just fine with the Right &#8212; Obama has adopted the Bush adminsitration&#8217;s positions on lawsuits over &#8220;torture,&#8221; warrantless wiretapping, state secrets and policies the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Propecia Online</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-23530</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Propecia Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-23530</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy Propecia Online...&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.folkd.com/user/buypropeciaonline Buy Propecia Online...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy Propecia Online&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.folkd.com/user/buypropeciaonline" rel="nofollow">http://www.folkd.com/user/buypropeciaonline</a> Buy Propecia Online&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Marie - Los Angeles</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-35195</link>
		<dc:creator>A Marie - Los Angeles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-35195</guid>
		<description>Is the president &quot;surprisingly flexible&quot; or is he not fully briefed on positions as you mention in the last paragraph? Does he have &quot;his hands full these days,&quot; or is he, as you imply, unable to &quot;take on more than one thing at a time?&quot; I think you&#039;ve hit on the complexity of issues even by trying to write about them. These issues are in need of close review compared to the obvious plug-the-hole-in-the-leaking-ship-that-is-our-economy strategy. What are your specific suggestions for how the president can become the rule of law (tongue-in-cheek) and quickly address the fragile issues you point out in previous articles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the president &#8220;surprisingly flexible&#8221; or is he not fully briefed on positions as you mention in the last paragraph? Does he have &#8220;his hands full these days,&#8221; or is he, as you imply, unable to &#8220;take on more than one thing at a time?&#8221; I think you&#39;ve hit on the complexity of issues even by trying to write about them. These issues are in need of close review compared to the obvious plug-the-hole-in-the-leaking-ship-that-is-our-economy strategy. What are your specific suggestions for how the president can become the rule of law (tongue-in-cheek) and quickly address the fragile issues you point out in previous articles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Mind</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-35196</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-35196</guid>
		<description>Is anyone really that suprised? I&#039;ve been saying all along that regardless of Democrats or Republicans, we are being given a choice of only two paths to the same exact destination. Maybe folks will start waking up and seeing it for what it is.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone really that suprised? I&#39;ve been saying all along that regardless of Democrats or Republicans, we are being given a choice of only two paths to the same exact destination. Maybe folks will start waking up and seeing it for what it is&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Marie - Los Angeles</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-23167</link>
		<dc:creator>A Marie - Los Angeles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-23167</guid>
		<description>Is the president &quot;surprisingly flexible&quot; or is he not fully briefed on positions as you mention in the last paragraph? Does he have &quot;his hands full these days,&quot; or is he, as you imply, unable to &quot;take on more than one thing at a time?&quot; I think you&#039;ve hit on the complexity of issues even by trying to write about them. These issues are in need of close review compared to the obvious plug-the-hole-in-the-leaking-ship-that-is-our-economy strategy. What are your specific suggestions for how the president can become the rule of law (tongue-in-cheek) and quickly address the fragile issues you point out in previous articles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the president &#8220;surprisingly flexible&#8221; or is he not fully briefed on positions as you mention in the last paragraph? Does he have &#8220;his hands full these days,&#8221; or is he, as you imply, unable to &#8220;take on more than one thing at a time?&#8221; I think you&#39;ve hit on the complexity of issues even by trying to write about them. These issues are in need of close review compared to the obvious plug-the-hole-in-the-leaking-ship-that-is-our-economy strategy. What are your specific suggestions for how the president can become the rule of law (tongue-in-cheek) and quickly address the fragile issues you point out in previous articles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Mind</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35170/nyt-wakes-up-to-obamas-surprising-flexibility-on-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1#comment-23133</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35170#comment-23133</guid>
		<description>Is anyone really that suprised? I&#039;ve been saying all along that regardless of Democrats or Republicans, we are being given a choice of only two paths to the same exact destination. Maybe folks will start waking up and seeing it for what it is.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone really that suprised? I&#39;ve been saying all along that regardless of Democrats or Republicans, we are being given a choice of only two paths to the same exact destination. Maybe folks will start waking up and seeing it for what it is&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

