<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress&#8217; 90 Percent Bonus Tax Is Probably Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesm</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/comment-page-1#comment-34645</link>
		<dc:creator>wesm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35159#comment-34645</guid>
		<description>Would you want YOUR government to single out and tax YOU? And would you want the money they are taxing to be money YOUR government agreed (signed a contract) with YOUR employers to give YOU? And the bonuses were no secret, they were public information from the day (months and months ago) that  they were signed by the government that was instituted for YOUR protection and to ensure YOUR rights were not being violated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you want YOUR government to single out and tax YOU? And would you want the money they are taxing to be money YOUR government agreed (signed a contract) with YOUR employers to give YOU? And the bonuses were no secret, they were public information from the day (months and months ago) that  they were signed by the government that was instituted for YOUR protection and to ensure YOUR rights were not being violated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesm</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/comment-page-1#comment-25739</link>
		<dc:creator>wesm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35159#comment-25739</guid>
		<description>Would you want YOUR government to single out and tax YOU? And would you want the money they are taxing to be money YOUR government agreed (signed a contract) with YOUR employers to give YOU? And the bonuses were no secret, they were public information from the day (months and months ago) that  they were signed by the government that was instituted for YOUR protection and to ensure YOUR rights were not being violated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you want YOUR government to single out and tax YOU? And would you want the money they are taxing to be money YOUR government agreed (signed a contract) with YOUR employers to give YOU? And the bonuses were no secret, they were public information from the day (months and months ago) that  they were signed by the government that was instituted for YOUR protection and to ensure YOUR rights were not being violated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melior</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/comment-page-1#comment-23088</link>
		<dc:creator>melior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35159#comment-23088</guid>
		<description>Failure to reward is not punishment. Nice try, though. We have a nice parting gift for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failure to reward is not punishment. Nice try, though. We have a nice parting gift for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Viagra</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/comment-page-1#comment-23067</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Viagra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35159#comment-23067</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy Viagra...&lt;/strong&gt;

http://url.edna.edu.au/4bbN Buy Viagra...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy Viagra&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://url.edna.edu.au/4bbN" rel="nofollow">http://url.edna.edu.au/4bbN</a> Buy Viagra&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynik</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/comment-page-1#comment-23073</link>
		<dc:creator>cynik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35159#comment-23073</guid>
		<description>The Court usually looks at the &quot;INTENT&quot; of the Law, if you watched CSPAN during the debate over this Tax Bill you would have seen and heard that the &quot;INTENT&quot; of those pushing for its passage was punitive. The theme of the debate by the Bills supporters was that those receiving the bonuses had to be punished, a word used repeatedly.   No matter what Congress put in writing the Intent of the Bill, in their own words, was to punish a single group.  If I were an attorney for those receiving bonuses I would get my hands on those CSPAN Videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Court usually looks at the &#8220;INTENT&#8221; of the Law, if you watched CSPAN during the debate over this Tax Bill you would have seen and heard that the &#8220;INTENT&#8221; of those pushing for its passage was punitive. The theme of the debate by the Bills supporters was that those receiving the bonuses had to be punished, a word used repeatedly.   No matter what Congress put in writing the Intent of the Bill, in their own words, was to punish a single group.  If I were an attorney for those receiving bonuses I would get my hands on those CSPAN Videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Experts: AIG Bonus Tax Probably Legal &#124; News America Now</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/comment-page-1#comment-23037</link>
		<dc:creator>Experts: AIG Bonus Tax Probably Legal &#124; News America Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35159#comment-23037</guid>
		<description>[...] Experts: AIG Bonus Tax Probably Legal                 Click Here for the News America Now home page and the latest news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Experts: AIG Bonus Tax Probably Legal                 Click Here for the News America Now home page and the latest news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reboot</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/35159/congress-90-percent-bonus-tax-is-probably-legal/comment-page-1#comment-23041</link>
		<dc:creator>reboot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=35159#comment-23041</guid>
		<description>... rarely struck down ? Even by a supreme court that is currently so pro-business and anti government  ? and generally anti &#039;the lesser classes and the masses&#039; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; rarely struck down ? Even by a supreme court that is currently so pro-business and anti government  ? and generally anti &#39;the lesser classes and the masses&#39; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

