<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Holbrooke Was an AIG Board Member Until Last Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/34963/richard-holbrooke-was-an-aig-board-member-until-last-year/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/34963/richard-holbrooke-was-an-aig-board-member-until-last-year</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: resume building</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/34963/richard-holbrooke-was-an-aig-board-member-until-last-year/comment-page-1#comment-81218</link>
		<dc:creator>resume building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=34963#comment-81218</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isreali Insensitivity &#124; The Dark Secret Place</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/34963/richard-holbrooke-was-an-aig-board-member-until-last-year/comment-page-1#comment-23290</link>
		<dc:creator>Isreali Insensitivity &#124; The Dark Secret Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=34963#comment-23290</guid>
		<description>[...] Did you know this? Richard Holbrooke Was an AIG Board Member Until Last Year [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did you know this? Richard Holbrooke Was an AIG Board Member Until Last Year [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knowbuddhau</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/34963/richard-holbrooke-was-an-aig-board-member-until-last-year/comment-page-1#comment-35122</link>
		<dc:creator>knowbuddhau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=34963#comment-35122</guid>
		<description>Richard Holbrooke, the Democratic Henry Kissinger, just a benchwarmer? Yeah right.  Sounds like a boardroom full of Perkinsian economic hit men.  We have covert military ops, so why not even consider the possibility that we also use covert financial and economic black ops?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Via Harper&#039;s Scott Horton:&lt;br&gt;The Associated Press’s special report on Pentagon “influence operations” can be read here. The Pentagon’s Public Affairs Office has been one of the last redoubts of the Neoconservatives. Burrowed Bush era figures remain in key positions in the office, which had responsibility for implementation of some of the Rumsfeld Pentagon’s most controversial strategies in which &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**the American public was targeted with practices previously associated with battlefield psy-ops.** [Emphasis obviously added.] &lt;a href=&quot;http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why would they shrink from black econo-ops?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the same people keep popping up in the very boardrooms where disaster capitalism&#039;s policies are set, why give a free pass to people like Holbrooke?  Why assume that finance is exempt from black ops?  Look at Holbrooke&#039;s CV, and ask yourself, who are today&#039;s EHMs, and who&#039;s giving them their marching orders?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Nothing to see here&quot; just doesn&#039;t cut it.  &quot;Typical backscratching&quot; doesn&#039;t either.  Like wars, which require a lot of planning, don&#039;t economic hit jobs take planning, too?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How &#039;bout those AIG kickbacks, huh?  Wink wink, nudge nudge. This is how we do it: oversell people on infrastructure, burden them with unforgiveable debt, then take over when they default.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or are all boardmembers magically transmogrified into &quot;honest&quot; members?  WTF, Ackerman, am I just not getting some sly joke here?  Please pardon my stupidity if I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Holbrooke, the Democratic Henry Kissinger, just a benchwarmer? Yeah right.  Sounds like a boardroom full of Perkinsian economic hit men.  We have covert military ops, so why not even consider the possibility that we also use covert financial and economic black ops?</p>
<p>Via Harper&#39;s Scott Horton:<br />The Associated Press’s special report on Pentagon “influence operations” can be read here. The Pentagon’s Public Affairs Office has been one of the last redoubts of the Neoconservatives. Burrowed Bush era figures remain in key positions in the office, which had responsibility for implementation of some of the Rumsfeld Pentagon’s most controversial strategies in which </p>
<p>**the American public was targeted with practices previously associated with battlefield psy-ops.** [Emphasis obviously added.] <a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359" rel="nofollow">http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359</a></p>
<p>Why would they shrink from black econo-ops?</p>
<p>When the same people keep popping up in the very boardrooms where disaster capitalism&#39;s policies are set, why give a free pass to people like Holbrooke?  Why assume that finance is exempt from black ops?  Look at Holbrooke&#39;s CV, and ask yourself, who are today&#39;s EHMs, and who&#39;s giving them their marching orders?</p>
<p>&#8220;Nothing to see here&#8221; just doesn&#39;t cut it.  &#8220;Typical backscratching&#8221; doesn&#39;t either.  Like wars, which require a lot of planning, don&#39;t economic hit jobs take planning, too?</p>
<p>How &#39;bout those AIG kickbacks, huh?  Wink wink, nudge nudge. This is how we do it: oversell people on infrastructure, burden them with unforgiveable debt, then take over when they default.</p>
<p>Or are all boardmembers magically transmogrified into &#8220;honest&#8221; members?  WTF, Ackerman, am I just not getting some sly joke here?  Please pardon my stupidity if I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Banking &#187; Richard Holbrooke Was An AIG Board Member Until Last Year</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/34963/richard-holbrooke-was-an-aig-board-member-until-last-year/comment-page-1#comment-22926</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Banking &#187; Richard Holbrooke Was An AIG Board Member Until Last Year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=34963#comment-22926</guid>
		<description>[...] Good Stock placed an observative post today on Richard Holbrooke Was An AIG Board Member Until Last YearHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUpdate: Ben Smith notes that Holbrooke has hit the banking trifecta: A colleague points out that Holbrooke also received a “friends of&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good Stock placed an observative post today on Richard Holbrooke Was An AIG Board Member Until Last YearHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUpdate: Ben Smith notes that Holbrooke has hit the banking trifecta: A colleague points out that Holbrooke also received a “friends of&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knowbuddhau</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/34963/richard-holbrooke-was-an-aig-board-member-until-last-year/comment-page-1#comment-22931</link>
		<dc:creator>knowbuddhau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=34963#comment-22931</guid>
		<description>Richard Holbrooke, the Democratic Henry Kissinger, just a benchwarmer? Yeah right.  Sounds like a boardroom full of Perkinsian economic hit men.  We have covert military ops, so why not even consider the possibility that we also use covert financial and economic black ops?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Via Harper&#039;s Scott Horton:&lt;br&gt;The Associated Press’s special report on Pentagon “influence operations” can be read here. The Pentagon’s Public Affairs Office has been one of the last redoubts of the Neoconservatives. Burrowed Bush era figures remain in key positions in the office, which had responsibility for implementation of some of the Rumsfeld Pentagon’s most controversial strategies in which &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;**the American public was targeted with practices previously associated with battlefield psy-ops.** [Emphasis obviously added.] &lt;a href=&quot;http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why would they shrink from black econo-ops?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When the same people keep popping up in the very boardrooms where disaster capitalism&#039;s policies are set, why give a free pass to people like Holbrooke?  Why assume that finance is exempt from black ops?  Look at Holbrooke&#039;s CV, and ask yourself, who are today&#039;s EHMs, and who&#039;s giving them their marching orders?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Nothing to see here&quot; just doesn&#039;t cut it.  &quot;Typical backscratching&quot; doesn&#039;t either.  Like wars, which require a lot of planning, don&#039;t economic hit jobs take planning, too?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How &#039;bout those AIG kickbacks, huh?  Wink wink, nudge nudge. This is how we do it: oversell people on infrastructure, burden them with unforgiveable debt, then take over when they default.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or are all boardmembers magically transmogrified into &quot;honest&quot; members?  WTF, Ackerman, am I just not getting some sly joke here?  Please pardon my stupidity if I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Holbrooke, the Democratic Henry Kissinger, just a benchwarmer? Yeah right.  Sounds like a boardroom full of Perkinsian economic hit men.  We have covert military ops, so why not even consider the possibility that we also use covert financial and economic black ops?</p>
<p>Via Harper&#39;s Scott Horton:<br />The Associated Press’s special report on Pentagon “influence operations” can be read here. The Pentagon’s Public Affairs Office has been one of the last redoubts of the Neoconservatives. Burrowed Bush era figures remain in key positions in the office, which had responsibility for implementation of some of the Rumsfeld Pentagon’s most controversial strategies in which </p>
<p>**the American public was targeted with practices previously associated with battlefield psy-ops.** [Emphasis obviously added.] <a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359" rel="nofollow">http://harpers.org/archive/2009/02/hbc-90004359</a></p>
<p>Why would they shrink from black econo-ops?</p>
<p>When the same people keep popping up in the very boardrooms where disaster capitalism&#39;s policies are set, why give a free pass to people like Holbrooke?  Why assume that finance is exempt from black ops?  Look at Holbrooke&#39;s CV, and ask yourself, who are today&#39;s EHMs, and who&#39;s giving them their marching orders?</p>
<p>&#8220;Nothing to see here&#8221; just doesn&#39;t cut it.  &#8220;Typical backscratching&#8221; doesn&#39;t either.  Like wars, which require a lot of planning, don&#39;t economic hit jobs take planning, too?</p>
<p>How &#39;bout those AIG kickbacks, huh?  Wink wink, nudge nudge. This is how we do it: oversell people on infrastructure, burden them with unforgiveable debt, then take over when they default.</p>
<p>Or are all boardmembers magically transmogrified into &#8220;honest&#8221; members?  WTF, Ackerman, am I just not getting some sly joke here?  Please pardon my stupidity if I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

