McKiernan On Reconciliation
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 at 11:28 am
Gen. David McKiernan, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, did an interview yesterday with Margaret Warner of the NewsHour. He didn’t really say anything unexpected — the war is “winnable” but not in strictly-military terms; security in Afghanistan is inextricable from security in Pakistan; he thinks the war will go on for years — but there was this recap of his views on reconciliation with the insurgency:
What I would say, though, is that [NATO troops] and U.S. military as well here favor the idea that if a fighter, if an insurgent wants to lay down their weapon, support the legitimate constitution of Afghanistan, then that probably is a legitimate reconciliation that should be led by the Afghan government, that certainly the military would be supportive of.
Question: what’s the difference here between “reconciliation” and “surrender?”
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss