Closer To A Progressive Consensus On Afghanistan?
Friday, March 13, 2009 at 12:39 pm
I mused earlier about how establishing a national consensus on the Afghanistan might still be possible. As it turns out, Jason Rosenbaum, one of the progressive forces behind Get Afghanistan Right, read Les Gelb’s op-ed in The New York Times and noted approvingly that Gelb, a founder of the National Security Network — which doesn’t always see eye to eye with Get Afghanistan Right — wrote something he could embrace. Jason emailed me:
I would agree with a lot of what Gelb said. It’s particularly noteworthy that Gelb has proposed a timeline of three years for a possible withdrawal, which I feel is a key component of a plan to start splitting the Taliban from Al-Qaeda, jump-starting Afghan self-governance, and forming a true coalition government. Our goal with regard to Afghanistan should be to keep America safe, and I think Gelb is starting to outline a policy that could protect our security interests without a commitment of 30,000 or 100,000 ground troops.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
3 Comments
Pingback posted March 14, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
[...] Ackerman at the Washington Independent has a quote from me on the recent Les Gelb Afghanistan op-ed in the New York Times: I mused earlier about how establishing a national consensus on the Afghanistan might still be [...]
Trackback posted March 23, 2009 @ 5:21 am
Buy Viagra Online…
http://url.edna.edu.au/4bbN Buy Viagra Online…
Pingback posted April 4, 2009 @ 4:36 pm
[...] Ackerman at the Washington Independent has a quote from me on the recent Les Gelb Afghanistan op-ed in the New York Times: I mused earlier about how establishing a national consensus on the Afghanistan might still be [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
rss