There’s More to Be Angry About Than Just Jim Cramer

By
Friday, March 13, 2009 at 10:39 am

I know, I know; everyone’s talking about the Jon Stewart-Jim Cramer confrontation Thursday night. Yes, it was entertaining, and yes, Stewart made some great points about financial journalism’s failures. But I’d like to move on now. There’s so much more to be angry about over this crisis than just Jim Cramer and CNBC.

For example, here’s this, a report from The Associated Press on how the NAACP is suing Wells Fargo and HSBC, alleging the two banks steered black borrowers into higher-cost subprime loans, even when they had credit scores identical to their white counterparts.

Class-action lawsuits were to be filed against the banks Friday in federal court in Los Angeles, Austin Tighe, co-lead counsel for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, told The Associated Press.

Black homebuyers have been 3 1/2 times more likely to receive a subprime loan than white borrowers, and six times more likely to get a subprime rate when refinancing, Tighe said. Blacks still were disproportionately steered into subprime loans when their credit scores, income and down payment were equal to those of white homebuyers, he said.

And here’s  one borrower’s experience, according to The Associated Press:

Amara Weaver of Milwaukee bought her first home in 1984, receiving a 6.25 percent fixed-rate mortgage. She says she had a steady job as a human resources director for a social services agency, never missed a mortgage payment and maintained excellent credit.

In 2004, she wanted to buy the house next door for her son to live in. She said the bank promised her a low fixed rate for a $40,000 loan, but at the closing, when reading the fine print, she noticed that the rate was actually 11 percent.

“I was blown away,” said Weaver, an NAACP member. “I didn’t have any choice (but to sign). … It made me feel violated.”

Similar NAACP lawsuits are pending against a dozen other subprime lenders.

It’s not something that happened on a cable TV show. It’s  harsh reality. The most troubling and overlooked aspect of the foreclosure crisis has been the discriminatory and most likely illegal behavior of many lenders in targeting minorities for high-cost loans. The damage done will be felt for decades.

Steering minorities into abusive loans isn’t fodder for entertainment. It probably won’t be dissected and excerpted all over the Internet. It’s just exactly what it seems — a tragedy. And maybe someday it will get the attention it deserves.

Comments

7 Comments

Chris
Comment posted March 13, 2009 @ 9:40 am

In regards to the Weaver issue, she plainly had a choice whether to sign or not to an 11% interest rate. If she felt obligated to accept, then it's her own fault and no one else is to blame. Had she had to foresight to simply negotiate the contract the issue would be null.

This is a case of someone putting accountability of their own actions at the blame of others, a trait the NAACP stands for time and again.


ON IT | Underreported
Pingback posted March 13, 2009 @ 2:55 pm

[...] a quote from Mary Kane, via Spencer Ackerman: The most troubling and overlooked aspect of the foreclosure crisis has been [...]


Jim Cramer the tip of the iceberg « Later On
Pingback posted March 13, 2009 @ 6:45 pm

[...] in Business, Daily life at 2:45 pm by LeisureGuy Mary Kane of the Washington Independent reports: I know, I know; everyone’s talking about the Jon Stewart-Jim Cramer confrontation Thursday [...]


mw
Comment posted March 24, 2009 @ 2:10 pm

Chris knows not of what he speaks.
It's not a matter of “negotiation” when a lender pulls a bait-and-switch at the closing of a home purchase. The borrower has already shelled out earnest money, downpayments, inspection and appraisal fees, etc., often thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars.
It becomes a matter of sign or lose that money — and possibly leave yourself open to a breach of contract lawsuit from the seller of the property. (In many cases, the purchaser is also selling their previous residence, creating more possibilities of legal exposure and financial hits if they don't sign the loan papers).
In this scenario, the lender is the one who lacks accountabilty. It's ultimately a case of bait and trap.


MiriamJoyce
Comment posted March 27, 2009 @ 10:57 am

Amen.


geb
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 4:31 pm

the naacp should sue acorn instead


geb
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 11:31 pm

the naacp should sue acorn instead


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.