Comments on: Convention as Psychodrama http://washingtonindependent.com/3300/beyond-catharsis-the-convention-as-psychodrama National News in Context Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:59:43 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Thamar http://washingtonindependent.com/3300/beyond-catharsis-the-convention-as-psychodrama/comment-page-1#comment-35042 Thamar Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:17:34 +0000 http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=3300#comment-35042 Bwaaa...funniest thing I've read yet on the Clintons. Like Samantha Bee (Jon Stewart's show) in her Flaming Orange Pantsuit taking over the convention. Couldn't get off the stage...Fun write up. <br><br>Jerry, See you shrink baby! Let go and laugh a little. You are very uptight for a psychologist. ;-) Bwaaa…funniest thing I've read yet on the Clintons. Like Samantha Bee (Jon Stewart's show) in her Flaming Orange Pantsuit taking over the convention. Couldn't get off the stage…Fun write up.

Jerry, See you shrink baby! Let go and laugh a little. You are very uptight for a psychologist. ;-)

]]> By: Thamar http://washingtonindependent.com/3300/beyond-catharsis-the-convention-as-psychodrama/comment-page-1#comment-4411 Thamar Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:17:34 +0000 http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=3300#comment-4411 Bwaaa...funniest thing I've read yet on the Clintons. Like Samantha Bee (Jon Stewart's show) in her Flaming Orange Pantsuit taking over the convention. Couldn't get off the stage...Fun write up. <br><br>Jerry, See you shrink baby! Let go and laugh a little. You are very uptight for a psychologist. ;-) Bwaaa…funniest thing I've read yet on the Clintons. Like Samantha Bee (Jon Stewart's show) in her Flaming Orange Pantsuit taking over the convention. Couldn't get off the stage…Fun write up.

Jerry, See you shrink baby! Let go and laugh a little. You are very uptight for a psychologist. ;-)

]]> By: Jerry http://washingtonindependent.com/3300/beyond-catharsis-the-convention-as-psychodrama/comment-page-1#comment-4393 Jerry Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:54:18 +0000 http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=3300#comment-4393 I enjoy Harry's work very much, but this post is just silly. As a practicing psychologist, the title of the article caught my eye. However, reading the post it seemed as if Harry was trying to fit as many Psych 101 references and Freudian defense mechanisms (some not even used correctly) into the article as possible. It's "cute" at best. P.S.--stay away from the object relations and Kleinian references if you don't know what you're talking about...they are complex and are not used properly in this context. I enjoy Harry's work very much, but this post is just silly. As a practicing psychologist, the title of the article caught my eye. However, reading the post it seemed as if Harry was trying to fit as many Psych 101 references and Freudian defense mechanisms (some not even used correctly) into the article as possible. It's “cute” at best. P.S.–stay away from the object relations and Kleinian references if you don't know what you're talking about…they are complex and are not used properly in this context.

]]>