Comments on: You’ve Got Galt

By: louis vuitton outlet

louis vuitton outlet — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:37:00 +0000

‘Sure. If the revolution won’t be televised, how are we supposed to sell advertising? ’
I AGREE WITH YOUR IDEA.

By: discount Louis vuitton

discount Louis vuitton — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:03:41 +0000

Kibbe has walked that number back, crediting the mistake to misinformation on Twitter, and that leaves ABC’s estimate of 60,000 to 70,000 protesters as the one that most media are using.

By: Rebelling by ‘going Galt’ « Christina’s Blog

Rebelling by ‘going Galt’ « Christina’s Blog — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:10:45 +0000

[...] David Wiegel makes a point that this phenomenen is another conservative insta-cause sprung up by the awakening of a silent majority, but that this idea of revolution will become more of a marketing slogan. Consider last year’s “Drill Baby Drill” mania, the Palin merchandise industry and Joe the Plumber. Posted by thu85 Filed in Uncategorized [...]

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:45:01 +0000

Sure. If the revolution won't be televised, how are we supposed to sell advertising?

By: james Hinds

james Hinds — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:33:14 +0000

It’s not wealth the common man is seeking. It is worth.

The common citizen feels lacking in worth. Nothing we have done seems to result in a fair shake. We don’t want hand-outs, we don’t want rigged shell-game mortgages. We only want to contribute to the country and have it make something meaningful.

Your Galt may be successful, but he just shrinks the pie. And economically sodomizes the rest of us.

I would be far happier if ‘free enterprise’ actually did work like your Adam Smith said it would

By: Dan

Dan — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:45:01 +0000

Sure. If the revolution won't be televised, how are we supposed to sell advertising?

By: james Hinds

james Hinds — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:33:14 +0000