<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Intelligence Council Pick May Be In Real Trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/32622/national-intelligence-council-pick-may-be-in-real-trouble/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/32622/national-intelligence-council-pick-may-be-in-real-trouble</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/32622/national-intelligence-council-pick-may-be-in-real-trouble/comment-page-1#comment-36668</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=32622#comment-36668</guid>
		<description>Further, why aren&#039;t they going after Blair?  Freeman can&#039;t change his spots now, for better or worse, &lt;i&gt;but Blair could have picked anyone for the spot!&lt;/i&gt;  Doesn&#039;t the Sarah Palin rule apply: the pick says more about the picker than the pickee.  In this case, it definitely does, because Blair was in no kind of tight spot politically, as McCain was, needing a boost to even be competitive.  Blair was at his leisure to make absolutely any selection he saw fit for this, and he chose Freeman.  Shouldn&#039;t the, uh, what-you-called-them really be going after Blair for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further, why aren&#39;t they going after Blair?  Freeman can&#39;t change his spots now, for better or worse, <i>but Blair could have picked anyone for the spot!</i>  Doesn&#39;t the Sarah Palin rule apply: the pick says more about the picker than the pickee.  In this case, it definitely does, because Blair was in no kind of tight spot politically, as McCain was, needing a boost to even be competitive.  Blair was at his leisure to make absolutely any selection he saw fit for this, and he chose Freeman.  Shouldn&#39;t the, uh, what-you-called-them really be going after Blair for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/32622/national-intelligence-council-pick-may-be-in-real-trouble/comment-page-1#comment-20991</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=32622#comment-20991</guid>
		<description>Further, why aren&#039;t they going after Blair?  Freeman can&#039;t change his spots now, for better or worse, &lt;i&gt;but Blair could have picked anyone for the spot!&lt;/i&gt;  Doesn&#039;t the Sarah Palin rule apply: the pick says more about the picker than the pickee.  In this case, it definitely does, because Blair was in no kind of tight spot politically, as McCain was, needing a boost to even be competitive.  Blair was at his leisure to make absolutely any selection he saw fit for this, and he chose Freeman.  Shouldn&#039;t the, uh, what-you-called-them really be going after Blair for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further, why aren&#39;t they going after Blair?  Freeman can&#39;t change his spots now, for better or worse, <i>but Blair could have picked anyone for the spot!</i>  Doesn&#39;t the Sarah Palin rule apply: the pick says more about the picker than the pickee.  In this case, it definitely does, because Blair was in no kind of tight spot politically, as McCain was, needing a boost to even be competitive.  Blair was at his leisure to make absolutely any selection he saw fit for this, and he chose Freeman.  Shouldn&#39;t the, uh, what-you-called-them really be going after Blair for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/32622/national-intelligence-council-pick-may-be-in-real-trouble/comment-page-1#comment-20874</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=32622#comment-20874</guid>
		<description>Are we sure the IG has in fact made a formal decision to investigate?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check out the IG letter itself:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/IG_promises_Freeman_inquiry.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/IG_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reads to me like a standard acknowledgment of receipt letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we sure the IG has in fact made a formal decision to investigate?  </p>
<p>Check out the IG letter itself:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/IG_promises_Freeman_inquiry.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/IG_&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Reads to me like a standard acknowledgment of receipt letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Critic</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/32622/national-intelligence-council-pick-may-be-in-real-trouble/comment-page-1#comment-20852</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=32622#comment-20852</guid>
		<description>The strategy is this: Chas Freeman and Dennis Ross are going to jointly withdraw from government.&lt;br&gt;Freeman will go back to his Saudi financed think tank to write about tolerance for religious and political dissidents.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dennis Ross will go back to his Israeli government think tank and write long treatises about the differences between Judaism, Zionism, being a critic of Israel, and being &quot;anti-Semitic.&quot;  And the American People all win.  Yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The strategy is this: Chas Freeman and Dennis Ross are going to jointly withdraw from government.<br />Freeman will go back to his Saudi financed think tank to write about tolerance for religious and political dissidents.  </p>
<p>Dennis Ross will go back to his Israeli government think tank and write long treatises about the differences between Judaism, Zionism, being a critic of Israel, and being &#8220;anti-Semitic.&#8221;  And the American People all win.  Yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

