http://washingtonindependent.com/32169/a-quid-pro-quo-with-russian-on-iran-missiles National News in Context Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:40:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://washingtonindependent.com/32169/a-quid-pro-quo-with-russian-on-iran-missiles/comment-page-1#comment-20126 Robert Farley: Obama’s letter to Russia on Iran and missile defence isn’t a quid pro quo | Let Me Tell You… Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:21:56 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=32169#comment-20126 [...] Spencer Ackerman, among others, has suggested that this represents a quid pro quo on Iran and missile defence. Quid pro quo, however, means “something for something”, and to treat this deal as a quid pro quo implies that the US is giving up something of value in return for Russian action. [...] [...] Spencer Ackerman, among others, has suggested that this represents a quid pro quo on Iran and missile defence. Quid pro quo, however, means “something for something”, and to treat this deal as a quid pro quo implies that the US is giving up something of value in return for Russian action. [...]

]]> http://washingtonindependent.com/32169/a-quid-pro-quo-with-russian-on-iran-missiles/comment-page-1#comment-35788 Eric Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:25:33 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=32169#comment-35788 Obama is a baby killing dope. Obama is a baby killing dope.

]]> http://washingtonindependent.com/32169/a-quid-pro-quo-with-russian-on-iran-missiles/comment-page-1#comment-19910 Eric Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:25:33 +0000 http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=32169#comment-19910 Obama is a baby killing dope. Obama is a baby killing dope.

]]>