Comments on: OLC Authorized Pentagon to Ignore Bill of Rights On U.S. Soil

By: Ari Melber: Big Questions for President Obama’s Big Press Conference | BlackNewsTribune.com

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:20:50 +0000

[...] the President has the power to suspend the Bill of Rights? Obama rightly released a series of disturbing claims to presidential power by the Bush administration, but the public discussion has not advanced much [...]

By: » SFAWBN Archive » “They” don’t need a warrant…

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:02:46 +0000

[...] The Washington Independent – 10 Mar ‘09 [...]

By: Booger

Booger — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:25:15 +0000

In my opinion-
The key term is 'time of war.'
It must be a congressionally declared [by majority vote] state of war against another nation or people.
In all cases, previous Gov restrictions or imprisonment occured
during periods of US declared state of war. [until recent times]

Iraq is not a US declared state of war against another nation.
Iraq, is a UN sanctioned [multi-national police action] operation that authorizes use of force.
Just as the Korean 'war' was a UN sanctioned police action.
Vietnam 'war' was a UN sanctioned police action.
BUT NOT A US DECLARED STATE OF WAR!

Just going about saying we are at war is wrong, misleading, and usually
[in recent times] used intentionally to misrepresent authorization for actions.

By: Booger

Booger — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:25:15 +0000

By: Bryan

Bryan — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:51:30 +0000

The fatal flaw in the argument is that “guaranteed by the First Amendment ” is incorrect. Those rights are bestowed by GOD and re-affirmed in the Bill of Rights. This is a critical difference. Man cannot override what GOD has put in place but can change and warp what man has decreed. If you view the Bill of Rights as the guarantee then Yoo's argument can be correct. If you understand that the Bill of Rights re-affirms GOD's mandate for man then Yoo's argument is patently wrong. However, Yoo's view is backed up by history in the United States, President Lincoln ordered imprisoned multiple people for speaking out (both verbally and in print) against the Civil War and his policies without warrant or trial or even access to legal council and used the military to carry out his orders.

By: B

Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:23:16 +0000

You all seem to forget What would happen if a nuke went off in NY, La, Kansas City,Orlando Then what would Mickey mouse look like

By: B

Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:19:15 +0000

People Bush Did what Any of us would do to protect American Lives

By: Bill

Bill — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:08:12 +0000

Oh, you don't like it when government wants take away your first amendment, huh?
Maybe the media should think about that the next time the government wants to take away any of the other constitutional rights that are included with that one.
I speak specifically about the 2nd amendment, which the media seems to conveniently forget, is just as valid as the 1st.

By: the remnant

the remnant — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:32:54 +0000

true news about what is really going on can be found here: operation cloverleaf, echelon, maincore lists, hr 645 and fema camps at thomas.gov, strangedaysstrangeskies, whatdoesitmean.com, haarp, cern enoch, jasher, cutting edge ministries, center for global research, operation red sky, illuminati, satanic symbols dia, freemasons and nwo agenda, ipto, op dragnet, north american union, book rise of the fourth reich, book 2008 god's final witness, amero, put on the full armor believers, this is spiritual warfare 106. ps biters, party on with all that you have stolen and have a big laugh at all of the misery you have caused over the past 6,000 years because your date with destiny fast approaches. till the day in 2012 love to all others

By: Kim

Kim — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:00:56 +0000

It looks like a few people in the government need to be hanged in a public place — after being tarred and feathered.