<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton Speaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/3197/bog-pappu-627c-clinton-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/3197/bog-pappu-627c-clinton-1</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:11:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KOB1</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/3197/bog-pappu-627c-clinton-1/comment-page-1#comment-38047</link>
		<dc:creator>KOB1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=3197#comment-38047</guid>
		<description>Mr. Pappu,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What, in Heaven&#039;s name, speech did you watch?  Because it sure wasn&#039;t the one most of the rest of us saw. The only &quot;thud&quot; connected with President Clinton&#039;s speech is your confused, perhaps delusional, reaction to his reasoned, detailed and eloquent indictment of the wrongs perpertrated upon the American people by an incompetent Republican administration that the Republican presumptive nominee has vowed to replicate.  And as far as the &quot;audience that was no longer his,&quot; I seem to recall exhuberent cheering that gave way to rapt attention that culminated in joyous appreciation for his perspective and insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Pappu,</p>
<p>What, in Heaven&#39;s name, speech did you watch?  Because it sure wasn&#39;t the one most of the rest of us saw. The only &#8220;thud&#8221; connected with President Clinton&#39;s speech is your confused, perhaps delusional, reaction to his reasoned, detailed and eloquent indictment of the wrongs perpertrated upon the American people by an incompetent Republican administration that the Republican presumptive nominee has vowed to replicate.  And as far as the &#8220;audience that was no longer his,&#8221; I seem to recall exhuberent cheering that gave way to rapt attention that culminated in joyous appreciation for his perspective and insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KOB1</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/3197/bog-pappu-627c-clinton-1/comment-page-1#comment-4308</link>
		<dc:creator>KOB1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=3197#comment-4308</guid>
		<description>Mr. Pappu,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What, in Heaven&#039;s name, speech did you watch?  Because it sure wasn&#039;t the one most of the rest of us saw. The only &quot;thud&quot; connected with President Clinton&#039;s speech is your confused, perhaps delusional, reaction to his reasoned, detailed and eloquent indictment of the wrongs perpertrated upon the American people by an incompetent Republican administration that the Republican presumptive nominee has vowed to replicate.  And as far as the &quot;audience that was no longer his,&quot; I seem to recall exhuberent cheering that gave way to rapt attention that culminated in joyous appreciation for his perspective and insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Pappu,</p>
<p>What, in Heaven&#39;s name, speech did you watch?  Because it sure wasn&#39;t the one most of the rest of us saw. The only &#8220;thud&#8221; connected with President Clinton&#39;s speech is your confused, perhaps delusional, reaction to his reasoned, detailed and eloquent indictment of the wrongs perpertrated upon the American people by an incompetent Republican administration that the Republican presumptive nominee has vowed to replicate.  And as far as the &#8220;audience that was no longer his,&#8221; I seem to recall exhuberent cheering that gave way to rapt attention that culminated in joyous appreciation for his perspective and insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
